If that's true, which I highly doubt it is, then why the glaring discrepancies with VAERS reporting and the number of deaths and injuries related to these "vaccines?"
My whole extended family, all 30 of them, PLIS my parents, brother and his wife, ALL got one of those shots and never reported their reactions to VAERS. Neither did their Drs when they asked why they had such bad reactions. How many people got one of these shots and never reported the issues? I'm betting at least 75%, at a minimum.
We all know what the deaths are being reported as, so I highly doubt these "judges" know what they're talking about here.
Also, be very leery about trusting anything else they say. There's plenty of citizen journalists now that can make, and have made, most of the claims these "judges" have made.
To me, that shows that they really aren't on the inside of anything. They're just like us, on the outside looking in, but are better at logical deductive reasoning, critical thinking, and effective deep dive research than most.
It's not hard to do the research properly and ascertain the same "conclusions" these "judges" have made.
A lot of the vaccines isn't the same as all the vaccines, which does make one wonder how bad it would have been if the majority of 'vaccines' were genuine.....
If that's true, which I highly doubt it is, then why the glaring discrepancies with VAERS reporting and the number of deaths and injuries related to these "vaccines?"
My whole extended family, all 30 of them, PLIS my parents, brother and his wife, ALL got one of those shots and never reported their reactions to VAERS. Neither did their Drs when they asked why they had such bad reactions. How many people got one of these shots and never reported the issues? I'm betting at least 75%, at a minimum.
We all know what the deaths are being reported as, so I highly doubt these "judges" know what they're talking about here.
Also, be very leery about trusting anything else they say. There's plenty of citizen journalists now that can make, and have made, most of the claims these "judges" have made.
To me, that shows that they really aren't on the inside of anything. They're just like us, on the outside looking in, but are better at logical deductive reasoning, critical thinking, and effective deep dive research than most.
It's not hard to do the research properly and ascertain the same "conclusions" these "judges" have made.
A lot of the vaccines isn't the same as all the vaccines, which does make one wonder how bad it would have been if the majority of 'vaccines' were genuine.....