About a year ago, in March of 2020 I believe, Trump mentioned he wanted prayers because he was about to make the most difficult decision of his life.
Any spectulation of what that was?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (169)
sorted by:
If the shots work as claimed by CDC, and as documented in medical journals, they are definitely harmful and the reports in VAERS are more or less what would be expected (undercounted by at least 10x of course).
Aside from the immediate and long term side effects, it also seems likely they set the recipient up for greater vulnerability to serious illness from similar viruses (e.g. colds) as the antibody levels reduce over time. If that is true then once you get the initial shot, you have to keep getting boosters or you have massively increased risk from what would be insignificant viruses to a non-vaxxed person. And every booster is rolling the dice on short/long term side effects, and incrementally destroying your remaining immune system. People will grow to hate those boosters.
This hasn't been proven to be the case yet, but it's a distinct possibility.
So, IMO we have to live with the unfortunate fact that better than 50% of our population is kind of fucked, including nearly everyone I know and care about. It's going to be tough but if it ushers in a new era of awakening and roots out the corruption in the process, I think we'll bounce back in a generation or two. Those of us remaining will need to start making kids though.
Imagine what WWII was like in Germany.. or any number of other massive calamities throughout history. The losses are incalculable, but somehow those remaining still create the future.
After all the lies from the CDC and the prominent medical authorities and organizations over the last 18 months, folks here are still quoting them as sources for their new fears.
Amazing.
I'm not saying the CDC is not lying about most things. AFAICT they in fact ARE lying about some aspects of the mechanism of the shots. My point was that even if you take what they say as true, what they describe is dangerous.
I'm just having trouble believing that somehow these shots are NOT dangerous, contrary to everything we have learned about them.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the point you are trying to make. I thought you were saying that these shots are NOT going to cause large scale death and suffering, that anecdotal reports on social media and VAERS reporting is not indicative of these shots' true nature. It is my opinion that both of those signals are fairly accurate and in fact the worst is yet to come.
Also, to clarify, when I say documented in medical journals, I am talking about things like the documented fact that subjects post vaccination have free floating spikes in their bloodstream at various times.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
Note that the authors did not seem to be too concerned about this finding. My interpretation was hmm, that's a free floating antigen I don't WANT in my bloodstream, and it can and does cause a lot of problems like strokes, heart attacks, inflammation, etc.
It's always important to separate the bullshit conclusion/narrative of an article from the facts it establishes - like how the CDC found that masks "slow the spread" by maybe 1%, but since 1>0, it's still worth it. Just because the topline conclusion they draw is wrong, doesn't mean that the data revealed in the study is wrong. The fact that the best they can do is publish counter-narrative data with a pro-narrative wrapup tells me the situation is if anything far worse for their narrative than the data suggests.
Enjoy the show. Q says that 67 times.
https://qposts.online/?q=enjoy+the+show&s=keyword
If you won't listen to Q when he says 67 different times to enjoy the show., I can only tell you that time will show you what Q is telling you.
The things you think you learned about the vaccine were from the same sources that are proven, skillful, liars. Academia are extreme leftists. CDC are leftists, They are all compromised and guilty.
If you think about what you said there: "the best they can do is..." When you are lying, you can lie as much as you want. You can craft a blatant lie, or you can craft a subtle, sneaky lie, to make people that are already suspicious of you believe what you want them to believe. A liar, who is lying about crimes and fraud and treason they have committed, will go to great lengths to have the audience of those lies believe them.
https://qposts.online/post/461
What makes a movie GOOD?
GREAT actors?
Q
Trump urges all Americans to get COVID vaccine: 'It's a safe vaccine' and it 'works'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-urges-all-americans-to-get-covid-vaccine-its-a-safe-vaccine
We are near the end of the movie now. It won't be too long before everyone realizes what the truths are. Either Trump and Q are lying, or the CDC and Academia are.
I very much appreciate your response. It's great to have a dialogue.
I know he has said "enjoy the show" and I do like that idea. There's no question that having the shots actually be saline (or even being actually safe and effective) would be vastly preferable to being harmful.
I also know the drops about multiple movies playing at once. In this case we have one movie claiming the shots are effective and work (pushed at face value by every layer of the establishment, and also by trump himself if you take his statement at face value) and another claiming that they are harmful (various social media sources, various heavily censored people on the internet, people on this forum and myself, being fairly well convinced.)
If I understand your position, it is that the vax/novax controversy is manufactured by creating false narratives of unsafety to further divide us, and to drum up more active conflict and provide new excuses for yet more authoritarian bullshit.
This theory implies: entering a lot of false data into VAERS, crisis actors to appear to keel over after the shots, social media / internet manipulation and corresponding fake censorship, and making sure real doctors and establishment people don't accidentally believe VAERS and other false sources of problems.
My dilemma is that taking the jab would make my life a whole lot easier - I'm under a lot of pressure to do so - and my children also are under pressure, and it could even be mandated for school next year. With my current mindset this is very distressing because I want to avoid it at all costs. Trusting the plan would suggest I should just get it and give it to the children. I understand trust the plan but I guess I'm not trusting enough to do this yet.
I have several other questions:
Do you think it's actually a vaccine that works, or just some harmless material?
Or is it an important vaccination against something else other than COVID?
Does COVID even exist at all?
Interesting data point: over at Quodverum they are strongly of the opinion that COVID exists and the vaccine is safe and effective and everyone should get it if possible, and its safety was not compromised by the speed of development and testing, which they attribute to removal of unnecessary red tape. Personally I don't think something like this can be developed safely in a year because by definition the long term effects cannot be known. Unless either: COVID does not exist and the shots are just saline; or COVID itself was under development for a long time before release and the vaccine was as well. Of course neither of those viewpoints are held by Quodverum folks.
I'm willing to go down these rabbitholes in good faith, but I'm still not ready to stake my life or the lives of loved ones on it. I would much rather take ivermectin prophylactically, which I believe to be known safe... but this doesn't help my pressure dilemmas. Because "CDC says ivermectin doesn't work".