About a year ago, in March of 2020 I believe, Trump mentioned he wanted prayers because he was about to make the most difficult decision of his life.
Any spectulation of what that was?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (169)
sorted by:
Agree 100%
But, it's not a flu shot - Influenza is a different virus. (Even though, as you observe, nearly all flu cases were classified as covid)
According to VAERS the flu shot killed 42/170M people, whereas covid vax killed 200x more...
Supposedly, researchers have spent 15 years attempting and failing to develop a working vaccine for SARS 1 (also a severe type of coronavirus, and prototype for SARS 2 / "covid"). So, it's possible that an attempt to do so in 3-6 months would also fail. (If you believe that they are mRNA technology .. that also has has 10 years of failure behind it, largely because they could not localize uptake or target specific cells)
100%
But, I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the idea of corrupt CDC fraudulently pumping UP the adverse events, when normally any significant signal in that database would cause an immediate halt. (Which of course didn't happen).
Reviewing the Q posts, I think Q is saying covid was something about as deadly as a bad flu year but was amplified for political purposes - totally agree. The vaccine as a "way out" of the fear programming has been somewhat successful, but then there's the question of risks, even if it was developed with good intentions.
For me, I'm not afraid of covid because I know it's not a real threat, especially with the even less dangerous "delta variant", and viable treatments exist which should cancel the EUA but for the massive corruption.
... but that doesnt mean i'm not concerned about being forced to poison myself.
It's too bad Q stopped posting lately, but he didn't seem to be that pro-vaccine
https://qposts.online/?q=vaccine&s=keyword
All I can say is I can't wait for the credits to roll on this movie.
When I said it's basically a flu shot, I meant it in the sense that we have a new virus, and they developed a vaccine for it, like they do each year with the seasonal flu.
You are of course, correct: the cold is not the flu, or vice-versa. If anyone took that from my statement, that was not my intention. I was trying to answer the question of what did I think the vaccine was, (I was asked was it saline, etc.) I was trying to make a comparison of it as being similar to the seasonal flu vaccine.
Sorry, I misunderstood your point.
If I understand, you mean that it is in fact a vaccine against coronavirus.
The authorities claim this is the case, and that it specifically targets the spike protein of the SARS 2 virus.
I believe both of those claims - but I am skeptical that the resulting vaccine is safe.
Flu vaccines based on well-tested platforms (tested over many years) and are annually updated with new strains. According to VAERS the flu vaccine is pretty safe. I'm not a fan of these for various reasons, but they don't seem that overtly harmful.
If we take the authorities story at face value: The new coronavirus vaccines are a new vaccine on a new platform with no long term studies in humans. They work using a very different mechanism from flu shots, which could reasonably be expected to cause problems (and indeed VAERS is a train wreck).
The vaccines used in the US are (claimed to be) based on mRNA or adenovirus vectored DNA platforms, which have never been approved for use in any product. I believe the Chinese vaccine is a killed or inactivated whole virus type vaccine which would be closer in mechanism to typical flu shots.
I would call Covid deaths an "adverse event"... and we know the CDC pumped up those up by 95%, and then quietly walked them back after the new year.
Yes, but the difference here is that VAERS deaths are counter-narrative.
Pumping up deaths from COVID creates the need for the vaccine. Pumping up adverse effects from the vaccine should be counterproductive to selling vaccines.
VAERS reports that are subsequently ignored does aid in the general attempt to divide the populace though.
The cabal's goals would "outrank" those of big pharma.
An adverse vaccine death narrative pushes fear, and prolongs a lock down justification.
I don't follow all the vaccine information, since I consider the sources disseminating it all have been proven to be biased in one way or the other, and I don't need it anyway. So, I can't really comment on it beyond saying I am confident that Trump would not encourage their use if it was poison.
I will say that the CDC, the Deep State the Cabal, are all proven, skilled, educated liars. They have folks reading these forums. They know how to craft a multi-layered narrative. We are easier to trick then we think we are.
The way to defeat them is easy, though. 1. Trust Trump. 2. Trust Q. 3. Trust the plan. And of course, have faith.
We all can see that events are accelerating now. It won't be much longer it seems. Then, finally, any doubts we have will be revealed, and the truth known.
But, if the goal of the cabal is a narrative that the vaccine is unsafe to support lockdown, wouldn't they turn on the fully controlled media machine to tell people about it and blame Trump? They would have sunk it out of the gate. There were plenty of media articles throwing doubt on the vaccines (and making pretty good points), up until Nov 3.
If anything, now they are using the media to push the vaccine and suppress doubt.
It could be that the cabal is losing some control over the media, although the media's response to the audit results (total blackout) suggests otherwise unfortunately.