Justice.gov site released foias that have the justice department talking about insurrection Act briefing, and invoking it because of the George Floyd riots..
All the q posts around that area imply it, especially this one https://qposts.online/post/4393
The reason he could invoke it also is because he requested the dc police for the rioters attacking the white house but the DC mayor is Democrat and said no, therefore he could invoke it also. Trump details this in a Q post 4403 on may 30th
https://qposts.online/?q=4403&s=postnum
Qpost 4413 on June 4th entails we are a republic
https://qposts.online/?q=4413&s=postnum
To top it all off, why do you think that he wanted that picture in front of the church holding the Bible? It is biblical, he was sworn in with the Bible by the military there. News even says he's only been there a few times, most notably when he was sworn in the first time in 2017!
There are many other qposts and foia documents that imply this, for real try to autist this guys because I'm pretty sure this is it, it was invoked June 3rd or June 4th..
Whatever you find please add a link so I can add to original post please
I don't buy any insurrection act narrative. Too many leftists exist in the military, that would be impossible to keep a lid on.
Exactly why they don't broadcast it, DHS and top military I think would be the ones to know.
"To top it all off, why do you think that he wanted that picture in front of the church holding the Bible? It is biblical, he was sworn in with the Bible by the military there. News even says he's only been there a few times, most notably when he was sworn in the first time in 2017!" I didn't know that. Didn't he get sworn in at the Capitol when he did his inauguration speech? I hope you're right. Every day brings almost crushing news - monitoring text messages, more vaxaclot crap, and also hope - Cuba Libertad!, and Mastriano taking the hits and dishing it out. This time line is just mind bending.
He attended the same church when he got inaugurated, with the same Bible, I thought I read that he re-did it at the church but Im not 100% sorry.. And yeah if you read around that time on documents, tweets, and qposts it all makes sense
Are you maybe 50% sorry?
Interesting
Good post! The foia downloads don't actually say that the insurrection act was invoked, only reference that the MN AG recommended it. That said, it's a good hypothesis, and by having it activated at that time, would free up the military to legally surveil the election. And the whole "photo op" explanation and counter-explanation never made sense anyway. Photo-op is msm fake news, but the counter-story of a threat to burn the building doesn't make sense either, as Trump's presence would be a liability for a pure security operation.
But is there a need for swearing to invoke the insurrection act?
Yeah obviously they couldn't, but to invoke it would mean to send federal troops and in the documents it does say that, and even AG barr released a statement June 2nd saying they are sending federal help.. They literally do everything except say it because they can't, infiltration not invasion.