But it's still proof of fraud. And fraud vitiates everything. Why excuse fraud just because it wasn't enough to change the outcome? It still means the DNC is complicit in national election fraud
Because 17 votes is within margin of error and could be considered plausible deniability. Even a clean election with voting IDs you'd expect some dodgy ballots.
It would have to be enough fraud to change the outcome of the state's winner to set things in motion. But I think there was more than enough fraud in Arizona.
But it's still proof of fraud. And fraud vitiates everything. Why excuse fraud just because it wasn't enough to change the outcome? It still means the DNC is complicit in national election fraud
Because 17 votes is within margin of error and could be considered plausible deniability. Even a clean election with voting IDs you'd expect some dodgy ballots.
It would have to be enough fraud to change the outcome of the state's winner to set things in motion. But I think there was more than enough fraud in Arizona.