But it's still proof of fraud. And fraud vitiates everything. Why excuse fraud just because it wasn't enough to change the outcome? It still means the DNC is complicit in national election fraud
It would have to be enough fraud to change the outcome of the state's winner to set things in motion. But I think there was more than enough fraud in Arizona.
If she comes back with "off by 17 votes" I'll hang up my hat and call it a day.
But it's still proof of fraud. And fraud vitiates everything. Why excuse fraud just because it wasn't enough to change the outcome? It still means the DNC is complicit in national election fraud
It would have to be enough fraud to change the outcome of the state's winner to set things in motion. But I think there was more than enough fraud in Arizona.