Was watching Newsmax yesterday when the doctor they usually have on was discussing the shot. He said (not quoting) you should take the vax; you can get blood clots to the brain and die but the chances are really low.
I gasped. If 1 person dies thats too much. I'm not a gambler, I dont care how low the chances are, esp if I end up one of them.
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
I know you can't provide any sources for your statements so won't bother to demand them. I actually do look at the numbers and yours are bs.
Shills are working hard today... that job must really suck.
Maybe not, but it's the only system the FDA & CDC have. It is not perfect, and may not be proof, as you say, that a vaccine is at fault, but it has been used as a first step in drawing exactly that conclusion since 1990.
Obviously the FDA & CDC, and all the vaxx companies know the shortcomings of VAERS. That raises the question as to why, knowing that they were about to inflict an experimental drug on the country, they didn't create a more accurate system to capture this information? I think it's safe to say, it's because they don't want the dangers of the vax to become known. And they don't care about any damage it may inflict.
Hospitals were never congested. No more than during every flu season. Emergency hospitals, ships, etc. were barely used. All that aside, what does the healthcare system have to do with the CDC and FDA? The CDC counts events, and pushes vaccines; the FDA approves drugs, and medical equipment.
Plus, the mRNA vaccine did not take them by surprise. This has been in the works for at least five years. If you ever worked with either of these agencies, as I have with software and medical devices, you would know that time is never of the essence.