RINO Dad Trying to Force Me to Get Vaccinated - The Great Awakening

RINO Dad Trying to Force Me to Get Vaccinated

posted 3 years ago by JoyousMischief 3 years ago by JoyousMischief +403 / -2

My college recently decided that non vaccinated students would have to go into a 7 day quarantine when they arrive on campus. My dad has been pushing for me to get vaccinated for months, but I’m 18 and my mom has been on my side this whole time so he has basically been all bluster. However, now he’s gone full tilt into rage mode that I won’t do what he thinks is “best for the family.” He has moved all of my stuff from around the house into my bedroom and is telling me that “I wanted to give you the choice but you are getting vaccinated by Friday.” I’m holding firm but I just wanted to share another story about how these deranged psychos will tear everything apart for their narrative.

286 comments

286 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (286)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– TDanonDJTJR2024 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

You said you were practicing law, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law. One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Tewdryg 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Who said anything about litigation? I certainly did not. This is just more of your inability to comprehend what you read. There's no reward for me to continue communicating with you. You tend to invent 'things' that are never stated and misconstrue simple written language. Farewell. Good luck with your reading challenges.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– TDanonDJTJR2024 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

So you're just gonna ignore the FACT you said multiple times now that you 'practice' law and ignored multiple times of being referred to as a lawyer afterwards with you only challenging being referred to as a lawyer when I asked for absolute proof????? Fuck outta here LARP

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– TDanonDJTJR2024 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

You said you were practicing law WHICH IS SOMETHING ONLY A LAWYER CAN DO, fuckhead:

Rule 138(Attorneys and Admission to the Bar), Section 34 was described by the Supreme Court in Maderada v. Mediodea (2003) as follows:

This provision means that in a litigation, parties may personally do everything during its progress — from its commencement to its termination. When they, however, act as their own attorneys, they are restricted to the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law; otherwise, ignorance would be unjustifiably rewarded. Individuals have long been permitted to manage, prosecute and defend their own actions; and when they do so, they are not considered to be in the practice of law. One does not practice law by acting for himself any more than he practices medicine by rendering first aid to himself.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q