Can someone maybe explain the difference between the audits and why I’m seeing a bunch of different people say they are finding really odd things about Georgia. Who’s doing their audit?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Perhaps also the fraud in GA is even more blatant and was quicker to find, however GA is just getting started and is presenting this evidence to justify going further.
I also think it's possible white hats were slow rolling AZ while the other states make their moves. At the end of the day, we are seeing progress and that is undeniable.
GA and MI are hands down the worst, next would be PA (PA could be worst then all of them, but it was harder to find information in that state) then AZ in my estimation. I was helping a lot back in November and December with finding dead voters and addresses that didn't exist.
I think zero way GA doesn't decertify along with AZ.
But I also fully expect shenanigan's and really am just not going to let myself get excited about any of it.
PA is likely the worst.
But they are best at covering their tracks
I was about to say does ga even have an official audit started?
No. They are only examining what the judge is allowing them to look at. It is not a complete audit. But I think they are now scanning at a higher resolution. To look for paper folds? Perfectly filled in ballots?
Correct, they need much higher resolution scans and then they can analyze the images for those artifacts. Also it looks like what they're revealing so far in Georgia is just how much of a joke the official recount was with all the forged tally sheets.