Iβm wondering if itβs a patriot tactic: on one front you have a slow and thorough process, with results being withheld until completed, on the other front you have whatβs coming out of Georgia on rapid fire.
I do keep wondering, though, why it seems that so much of this black down and dirty stuff needs to be exposed to public....in some way it is like trying the case in the public arena rather than in the courts...and as I write that, I think, well, duh, it is because the courts are too corrupt to handle it so going to the public has to happen to get it out there...
Iβm wondering if itβs a patriot tactic: on one front you have a slow and thorough process, with results being withheld until completed, on the other front you have whatβs coming out of Georgia on rapid fire.
Hmmm, maybe a contrast on purpose...
I do keep wondering, though, why it seems that so much of this black down and dirty stuff needs to be exposed to public....in some way it is like trying the case in the public arena rather than in the courts...and as I write that, I think, well, duh, it is because the courts are too corrupt to handle it so going to the public has to happen to get it out there...
Sometimes it's necessary to use public pressure to make bureaucrats actually do their jobs? shocking, lmao.
That