So Social Media acting at the request of government violates the 1st Amendment by banning free speech, and issuing a prior restraint on speech. I'm not a lawyer but I've seen them on TV. MSM are now acting as a publisher rather than a public space, which is also against what they're supposed to be doing, right?
Yuuppp. By the government getting involved in this, they have adequately removed "muh private business", so come on libertarians. Join us in the fight now.
So Social Media acting at the request of government violates the 1st Amendment by banning free speech, and issuing a prior restraint on speech. I'm not a lawyer but I've seen them on TV. MSM are now acting as a publisher rather than a public space, which is also against what they're supposed to be doing, right?
Yuuppp. By the government getting involved in this, they have adequately removed "muh private business", so come on libertarians. Join us in the fight now.
That sounds an awful lot like collusion to me, not to mention a gross violation of first amendment rights.
You are walking into a trap with such unconstitutional drivel, and you will not like the outcome.
https://gab.com/grandoldmemes/posts/106592373682502649
They are pathetic.
Does that mean if we ban someone on ga.win they will be banned on facebook as well? I think I like this idea. /s