All they have to do is both agree not to “make a story” out of a particular world event, and just like that, it’s not a story.
Like if Fox wanted to continue to make the burning of Notre Dame a major world news story, then they could. There would be angles to make that a nightly news story for months and months. The human interest is there. There is destruction. There are suspects. There is a crime. There would have been an investigation if it hadn’t been ignored. As a news story, it is one of the biggest of the decade, if not the century. France’s 9/11.
Totally ignored.
That said, it seemed to me on Election Night when the election count was frozen and everyone was told to go home, all at the same time, in six different states, all because of a pipe burst in one county in Arizona (that was just a toilet that needed to be plunged), when the suitcases of fraudulent ballots were pulled out from under the tables and the overnight fraud was officially launched, that Baier and McCallum were not informed ahead of time that this was happening. There was a moment there where they looked dazed and confused and expressed confused skepticism about what was going on. And I think they were kept out of the loop. I think they had to make their decision that night to play along with the fraud or not. That would be the best way to make them bend the knee, as they could already see it proceeding. All these Fox News people (except Lou Dobbs) made the same decision: they would look the other way on the fraud that was happening because at that time it appeared that the fraud was just going to be pushed through and who were they (except Lou Dobbs) to call bullshit. Even Rush Limbaugh didn’t want to talk about the fraud at a certain point and would steer his callers away from their outrage. But you could tell he knew it was a fraudulent election but it almost sounded like all his radio affiliates had been told they would not be allowed to broadcast any dissent to the fraud.
I think one of the reasons the footage of Election Night has been scrubbed from the Internet, and why there are no compilations or clips, and why even our side hasn’t put in much effort (it seems) to preserve and share and archive and torrent and meme this footage, is because the elites have this so censored that even WE don’t talk about it. And I think they are censoring it because that footage is basically the scene of the crime. I think there are all sorts of things - like this Baier/McCallum honest reaction before commercial break - that would help prove and show and visualize the fraud to normies, so it’s all been censored. We should have autists cross-referencing and analyzing that footage like the Zapruder film. I think the raw footage shows the numbers acting very funky too.
Controlled dueling opposition. Uniparty shenanigans.
All they have to do is both agree not to “make a story” out of a particular world event, and just like that, it’s not a story.
Like if Fox wanted to continue to make the burning of Notre Dame a major world news story, then they could. There would be angles to make that a nightly news story for months and months. The human interest is there. There is destruction. There are suspects. There is a crime. There would have been an investigation if it hadn’t been ignored. As a news story, it is one of the biggest of the decade, if not the century. France’s 9/11.
Totally ignored.
That said, it seemed to me on Election Night when the election count was frozen and everyone was told to go home, all at the same time, in six different states, all because of a pipe burst in one county in Arizona (that was just a toilet that needed to be plunged), when the suitcases of fraudulent ballots were pulled out from under the tables and the overnight fraud was officially launched, that Baier and McCallum were not informed ahead of time that this was happening. There was a moment there where they looked dazed and confused and expressed confused skepticism about what was going on. And I think they were kept out of the loop. I think they had to make their decision that night to play along with the fraud or not. That would be the best way to make them bend the knee, as they could already see it proceeding. All these Fox News people (except Lou Dobbs) made the same decision: they would look the other way on the fraud that was happening because at that time it appeared that the fraud was just going to be pushed through and who were they (except Lou Dobbs) to call bullshit. Even Rush Limbaugh didn’t want to talk about the fraud at a certain point and would steer his callers away from their outrage. But you could tell he knew it was a fraudulent election but it almost sounded like all his radio affiliates had been told they would not be allowed to broadcast any dissent to the fraud.
I think one of the reasons the footage of Election Night has been scrubbed from the Internet, and why there are no compilations or clips, and why even our side hasn’t put in much effort (it seems) to preserve and share and archive and torrent and meme this footage, is because the elites have this so censored that even WE don’t talk about it. And I think they are censoring it because that footage is basically the scene of the crime. I think there are all sorts of things - like this Baier/McCallum honest reaction before commercial break - that would help prove and show and visualize the fraud to normies, so it’s all been censored. We should have autists cross-referencing and analyzing that footage like the Zapruder film. I think the raw footage shows the numbers acting very funky too.