11,326. A seemingly random number. A unique, specific number. So what’s in a number? 11,326.
That’s the exact number of UNREGISTERED people who voted in Maricopa County, AZ in the 2020 election.
That’s the exact number of people who illegally voted, had their votes counted, and added to the certified election results in AZ.
11,326. That’s the exact number of UNREGISTERED people who voted in AZ in Maricopa County and DID NOT APPEAR on any AZ voter rolls on 11/6/2021, but magically appeared on AZ voting rolls a month later.
Let me break down what that means:
11,326 people who weren’t registered voted in AZ illegally. Someone found this, and found they were not on the voting rolls.
Someone then added them to the voting rolls a month later, to try to cover this up & hide it.
The ONLY people who can change voting rolls is a state’s secretary of state.
Katie Hobbs. Soros bought & paid for Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.
The same Katie Hobbs trying to stop the #AZaudit
You know what this shows?
-
Knowledge of the votes & no action taken to remove them from results.
-
Knowledge that someone was looking into it.
-
A DELIBERATE attempt to cover it up by illegally altering state records.
#YOU'RE GOING DOWN, KATIE HOBBS!
EDIT: According to multiple websites ( not using Google) they all state it is 10, 457. Sorry for the error (not my post).
H/T: The Library : Harold’s Library https://t.me/The_Library_II
It also adds up to 13, special for other reasons. I'm on your side, but ...How is it possible that all the other fraud added up to a pure tie? And why?
Regarding Hobbs, isn't it likely that SOS Hobbs has underlings to take the fall? It stands to reason that many people under her have the job description, and the authority, to add to the voter roll.
Also, for completeness, we should find out the law in Arizona as far as being eligible but unregistered: many jurisdictions (neighboring CA for example) allow for people to vote while they register on a probationary basis on the day of voting. I was expecting this to come out as an excuse for that portion of the fraud.
Not trying to downplay the significance ... even with fraud it's freaky (obviously not freaky if it's intentional) that the victory margin for the state is equal to the number of voters added post-election. But it raises questions. Good observation.
https://azsos.gov/elections/arizona-election-laws-publications
Link proves my point. Plenty of wiggle room for provisional ballots, with people providing ID later on. The administrative act of entering those people onto the rolls may be unrelated to counting their ballots. I'm convinced of the steal, and intrigued by this number... just don't like bringing up arguments that have potentially legit counters. (For example, all those people could be recognized tribe members with no address on their ID, to force cyber ninjas to go asking for Navajo Nation records to reconcile.) Anyway, ... I'm still looking forward to the full audit report.
TRUTH doesn't need hype. It stands on its own.