I agree that this is an amazing site BUT .... The 'Early Treatment' efficacy percentage is MASSIVLEY skewed. That calculation includes the last two studies that were MANY MANY standard deviations away from the aggregate mean. It should be somewhere in the low to mid 80's% when you remove standard deviations +3 and greater. That is what your supposed to do anyway.
I also call into question the 'Improvement' percentages ... Look at the López-Medina study. There were ZERO deaths from observations in the 'treatment' bin. If no one died that was treated, and one person died that was not ... that is 100% improvement. So, given that LOGIC, the lowest possible outcome for that study is 100% improvement over control. I gotta run to church but I'm gonna pour over these this afternoon.
AGAIN ... MASSSIVE MASSIVE UPDOOT ON THIS LINK. JUST ADDED IT AS A BOOKMARK IN MY BROWSER.
Man I am so glad you are calling out the important things like how someone spelled a word rather than what they meant.
I mean, forum post grammar and spelling are clearly the biggest issues we face right now in this country and should be placed at the top of our concerns.
Your .. I mean you are truly a front line warrior in our great struggle against tyranny.
Check this out, real time meta analysis of 60 studies.
https://ivmmeta.com/#fig_fpall
Amazing site.
I agree that this is an amazing site BUT .... The 'Early Treatment' efficacy percentage is MASSIVLEY skewed. That calculation includes the last two studies that were MANY MANY standard deviations away from the aggregate mean. It should be somewhere in the low to mid 80's% when you remove standard deviations +3 and greater. That is what your supposed to do anyway.
I also call into question the 'Improvement' percentages ... Look at the López-Medina study. There were ZERO deaths from observations in the 'treatment' bin. If no one died that was treated, and one person died that was not ... that is 100% improvement. So, given that LOGIC, the lowest possible outcome for that study is 100% improvement over control. I gotta run to church but I'm gonna pour over these this afternoon.
AGAIN ... MASSSIVE MASSIVE UPDOOT ON THIS LINK. JUST ADDED IT AS A BOOKMARK IN MY BROWSER.
I have difficulty in affording credibility to anyone who can't see the difference between "your" and "you're", "pour" and "pore", and the other typos.
Please tell me that you're dyslexic.
Man I am so glad you are calling out the important things like how someone spelled a word rather than what they meant.
I mean, forum post grammar and spelling are clearly the biggest issues we face right now in this country and should be placed at the top of our concerns.
Your .. I mean you are truly a front line warrior in our great struggle against tyranny.
This is the way.
Thanks for sharing that site.
Thanks for sharing. More people need to know about that site.