Their oath is first, to do no harm. Most doctors who are dissident from the CDC will keep it confidential, confiding in their patients rather than the news. Why? Because they will be replaced with a doctor who does not question the jab.
They are not obligated by their oath to blow the whistle publically, so to speak. They are, however, obligated to inform you of side-effects so that you as a patient can give informed consent before you receive the jab.
I believe some doctor are choosing to remain ignorant on the vax side effects and issues to comply with their oath. But ignorance won't save them. I praise the brave doctors going against the narrative and standing for their patients.
Becoming an oath breaker takes an even greater toll, for once that trust has been lost it can never again be as it was.
Their oath is first, to do no harm. Most doctors who are dissident from the CDC will keep it confidential, confiding in their patients rather than the news. Why? Because they will be replaced with a doctor who does not question the jab.
They are not obligated by their oath to blow the whistle publically, so to speak. They are, however, obligated to inform you of side-effects so that you as a patient can give informed consent before you receive the jab.
I believe some doctor are choosing to remain ignorant on the vax side effects and issues to comply with their oath. But ignorance won't save them. I praise the brave doctors going against the narrative and standing for their patients.
Well said.