It's not about countering a lie with a verifiable fact. If you know anything about fake news and gaslighting, its not that they tell you outright lies, but they lie to you by omission, or by giving wrong context, or by jumping to wrong conclusions.
Lincoln the racist
It maybe true that Lincoln considered his own race superior to that of the slaves. But that makes him just as much a racist as all the founding fathers and pretty much anyone his contemporary.
The truth is - he didnt care about ending slavery. The lie is that - it makes him evil.
A third myth is that Lincoln’s war saved the Union.
The war was never about slavery, just as the BLM is never about Black people. Like now, even then, it was Globalists creating trouble and turmoil because they were throwing a tantrum for not getting what they wanted - financial control. So they decided to destroy the country by breaking it up, by using slavery as an excuse.
What Lincoln did was simply defeating the Globalist's goal. Did he save the Union geographically? Did he ruin the Union philosphically? It simply doesn't matter because those were not the factors - the factor was defeating the Globalist goal of destroying the country. This is just after the fact spin
Lincoln the dictator
This is exactly what they will be saying about Trump. So he suspended Habeas Corpus? So he arrested journalists? What would you say if Trump invoked / has secretly invoked insurrection act? What would you say if he jails Anderson Cooper or Rachael Maddow or any of the CNN/MSDNC operatives trying to destroy the country?
Infact - this might be the real reason for this article. To smear what Lincoln did here as something evil, so the same can be applied to current events.
Only war, say its mythologisers and apologists, could have ended slavery.
This is simply them rubbing it into our faces. They create the war and blame us for waging it. Same applies for the world wars, or vietnam war or any other wars.
Yes, war could have been avoided. If the Globalists didnt bother to manipulate us.
This is good stuff. The war certainly wasn't about ending slavery. Lincoln could have done that by simply buying out the slave holders like every other Western country did.
So why the war? I have heard a lot about the financial exploitation of the South by the North being the prime mover. I hadn't considered that Globalists might be behind that, but it certainly fits their M.O. Do you have anything you could point me to for more information?
You do realize they shot him in the back of the head and then paved the way to centralized gov? Usually it’s the good guys that get shot in the back of the head.
I’ll tell you one thing. Knowing about Albert Pike ( a globalist and mason who was a confederate general )and who his buddies were, tells me a lot. But we also know that the globalists always try and play both sides so who knows, time will tell. I admire and hold with high revere many of the confederate Generals and believe I would be there right behind them based on their view of what was going on at the time, But hindsight is usually 20/20 and Albert Pikes allegiance to the confederacy and the largely democrat ran government that was riddled with masons and globalists and is the same today as it was back then is more than I need to know about the intent or motives behind secession.
It's not about countering a lie with a verifiable fact. If you know anything about fake news and gaslighting, its not that they tell you outright lies, but they lie to you by omission, or by giving wrong context, or by jumping to wrong conclusions.
It maybe true that Lincoln considered his own race superior to that of the slaves. But that makes him just as much a racist as all the founding fathers and pretty much anyone his contemporary.
The truth is - he didnt care about ending slavery. The lie is that - it makes him evil.
The war was never about slavery, just as the BLM is never about Black people. Like now, even then, it was Globalists creating trouble and turmoil because they were throwing a tantrum for not getting what they wanted - financial control. So they decided to destroy the country by breaking it up, by using slavery as an excuse.
What Lincoln did was simply defeating the Globalist's goal. Did he save the Union geographically? Did he ruin the Union philosphically? It simply doesn't matter because those were not the factors - the factor was defeating the Globalist goal of destroying the country. This is just after the fact spin
This is exactly what they will be saying about Trump. So he suspended Habeas Corpus? So he arrested journalists? What would you say if Trump invoked / has secretly invoked insurrection act? What would you say if he jails Anderson Cooper or Rachael Maddow or any of the CNN/MSDNC operatives trying to destroy the country?
Infact - this might be the real reason for this article. To smear what Lincoln did here as something evil, so the same can be applied to current events.
This is simply them rubbing it into our faces. They create the war and blame us for waging it. Same applies for the world wars, or vietnam war or any other wars.
Yes, war could have been avoided. If the Globalists didnt bother to manipulate us.
This is good stuff. The war certainly wasn't about ending slavery. Lincoln could have done that by simply buying out the slave holders like every other Western country did.
So why the war? I have heard a lot about the financial exploitation of the South by the North being the prime mover. I hadn't considered that Globalists might be behind that, but it certainly fits their M.O. Do you have anything you could point me to for more information?
You do realize they shot him in the back of the head and then paved the way to centralized gov? Usually it’s the good guys that get shot in the back of the head.
I’ll tell you one thing. Knowing about Albert Pike ( a globalist and mason who was a confederate general )and who his buddies were, tells me a lot. But we also know that the globalists always try and play both sides so who knows, time will tell. I admire and hold with high revere many of the confederate Generals and believe I would be there right behind them based on their view of what was going on at the time, But hindsight is usually 20/20 and Albert Pikes allegiance to the confederacy and the largely democrat ran government that was riddled with masons and globalists and is the same today as it was back then is more than I need to know about the intent or motives behind secession.