Please quote literally anywhere on this site or on Reddit that I have said cheating is impossible and that fraud could not be possible.
Literally anywhere.
I don’t mind the debate, but you are constantly putting words in my mouth to straw-man my posts and assuming the conclusions I’m going to come to, and I don’t feel like that is particularly good faith on your part.
With respect, people were telling me 100% there was no chance Biden was getting anywhere near the White House on Inauguration Day, and that I would be so surprised and they’d be laughing so hard when I saw I was wrong.
Look, why don’t we wait to see what actually happens with the audit before you start putting all your eggs in that basket.
Assuming the audit has already incontestably proven what you believe before the courts have even had a chance to review and the opposition a chance to defend themselves it is one step above datefagging, and there is a reason datefagging is frowned upon here.
Also, it surprises me that you care so much about bellwethers in a Trump election. The man clearly upsets the normal predictive algorithms for elections. You’re cherry-picking which election predictors you want to believe are credible in order to support your argument. I rightfully had no faith in anyone’s ability to predict how Trump would do in either election.
Please quote literally anywhere on this site or on Reddit that I have said cheating is impossible and that fraud could not be possible.
Literally anywhere.
I don’t mind the debate, but you are constantly putting words in my mouth to straw-man my posts and assuming the conclusions I’m going to come to, and I don’t feel like that is particularly good faith on your part.
No, I didn’t say that either.
I said cheating could have happened. I’m saying there is a nonzero possibility that there was major election fraud.
You are confusing a recognition of the impossibility of proving a negative with an endorsement of the positive.
With respect, people were telling me 100% there was no chance Biden was getting anywhere near the White House on Inauguration Day, and that I would be so surprised and they’d be laughing so hard when I saw I was wrong.
Look, why don’t we wait to see what actually happens with the audit before you start putting all your eggs in that basket.
Assuming the audit has already incontestably proven what you believe before the courts have even had a chance to review and the opposition a chance to defend themselves it is one step above datefagging, and there is a reason datefagging is frowned upon here.
Also, it surprises me that you care so much about bellwethers in a Trump election. The man clearly upsets the normal predictive algorithms for elections. You’re cherry-picking which election predictors you want to believe are credible in order to support your argument. I rightfully had no faith in anyone’s ability to predict how Trump would do in either election.