You know, you keep posting my stuff over here that I specifically write over there to avoid directly debunking you over here, and the mods are going to suspect you’re in cahoots with me toward some more underhanded purpose.
You're not deboonking anything. Your take is just an assumption, a theory. I wonder, why is fraud so impossible to you? If everyone hated Trump as much as you did, then why is it so outrageous to think that his haters would go to extraordinary lengths to get him out of office, even if that includes cheating?
Please quote literally anywhere on this site or on Reddit that I have said cheating is impossible and that fraud could not be possible.
Literally anywhere.
I don’t mind the debate, but you are constantly putting words in my mouth to straw-man my posts and assuming the conclusions I’m going to come to, and I don’t feel like that is particularly good faith on your part.
But I don’t hear a position, take on that position, and then try to prove it. That’s where “trust, but verify” gets you.
I assume everyone is lying, including Trump, including Q, and force them to prove their arguments.
Verify, THEN trust.
That’s the only way to avoid being manipulated by people who lie to you. It’s the only way to avoid fake news.
Verify, THEN trust.
I am in the process of trying and failing to prove Trump’s claim about massive election fraud affecting the results. I do not think it’s impossible, but I can’t prove it using any of the evidence circling around this board.
And apparently, neither can any lawyer that has worked for your movement.
Maybe that will change, and when I see evidence in the future that election fraud changed the outcome, I will amend my beliefs.
But I verify, THEN trust. And so far, that has stopped me from accepting the vast majority of the evidence on this issue that you guys are willing to accept.
We are both looking forward to the audit results and the evidence they uncover.
The problem is there was no debunking. Just another baseless mockingbird opinion to help with the mountain of evidence proving China Joe didn’t really win the election.
It’s ok, we will be here for you when you’ve accepted reality.
But I try to be respectful of your space when I’m here, and you deciding to keep bringing Reddit stuff over here is basically overriding how I’m choosing to balance my life out. Which is fine.
I just wouldn’t blame the mods for suspecting that you’re trying to shoehorn my Reddit stuff over here for some obscured reason. You didn’t even do a tiny-text debunk on this one.
I honestly don’t think a TikTok video from a guy looking to prove a point like this is considered strong evidence that Biden could only win through election fraud.
The late night shows do exactly this same thing to Trump supporters, and I don’t believe them when they do it either. These videos specifically look for the stupidest responses and cut them together.
Please do not fall for that sort of poppycock. You call yourself a researcher. Act like one.
No need to tiny-text debunk your post because everything you said is wrong. You're entitled to your own opinion, even if your opinion is wrong. He just posted it for all of us to see how wrong you are on everything, which in turn, you have debunked yourself.
You know, you keep posting my stuff over here that I specifically write over there to avoid directly debunking you over here, and the mods are going to suspect you’re in cahoots with me toward some more underhanded purpose.
You're not deboonking anything. Your take is just an assumption, a theory. I wonder, why is fraud so impossible to you? If everyone hated Trump as much as you did, then why is it so outrageous to think that his haters would go to extraordinary lengths to get him out of office, even if that includes cheating?
Please quote literally anywhere on this site or on Reddit that I have said cheating is impossible and that fraud could not be possible.
Literally anywhere.
I don’t mind the debate, but you are constantly putting words in my mouth to straw-man my posts and assuming the conclusions I’m going to come to, and I don’t feel like that is particularly good faith on your part.
It’s not impossible in the least.
But I don’t hear a position, take on that position, and then try to prove it. That’s where “trust, but verify” gets you.
I assume everyone is lying, including Trump, including Q, and force them to prove their arguments.
Verify, THEN trust.
That’s the only way to avoid being manipulated by people who lie to you. It’s the only way to avoid fake news.
Verify, THEN trust.
I am in the process of trying and failing to prove Trump’s claim about massive election fraud affecting the results. I do not think it’s impossible, but I can’t prove it using any of the evidence circling around this board.
And apparently, neither can any lawyer that has worked for your movement.
Maybe that will change, and when I see evidence in the future that election fraud changed the outcome, I will amend my beliefs.
But I verify, THEN trust. And so far, that has stopped me from accepting the vast majority of the evidence on this issue that you guys are willing to accept.
We are both looking forward to the audit results and the evidence they uncover.
What about the 17 of the 22 cases Trump's team won? That's 75%+
“Cases won” doesn’t tell us anything.
Have those cases proven widespread, election-changing fraud yet?
Not yet, as far as I have seen.
Have those cases further resulted in the world changing in a way in which you expect per Q’s plan?
Also, not as far as I’ve seen.
So I will keep waiting. Maybe the AZ audit will prove what you think it will and we’ll all be on the same page.
So pulling theories out of your ass is now considered debunking someone? Then you did it.
If you're an example of what we're up against I'm not worried at all, in fact I'm laughing so hard my sides hurt.
The problem is there was no debunking. Just another baseless mockingbird opinion to help with the mountain of evidence proving China Joe didn’t really win the election.
It’s ok, we will be here for you when you’ve accepted reality.
It doesn’t bother me in the least.
But I try to be respectful of your space when I’m here, and you deciding to keep bringing Reddit stuff over here is basically overriding how I’m choosing to balance my life out. Which is fine.
I just wouldn’t blame the mods for suspecting that you’re trying to shoehorn my Reddit stuff over here for some obscured reason. You didn’t even do a tiny-text debunk on this one.
I honestly don’t think a TikTok video from a guy looking to prove a point like this is considered strong evidence that Biden could only win through election fraud.
The late night shows do exactly this same thing to Trump supporters, and I don’t believe them when they do it either. These videos specifically look for the stupidest responses and cut them together.
Please do not fall for that sort of poppycock. You call yourself a researcher. Act like one.
No need to tiny-text debunk your post because everything you said is wrong. You're entitled to your own opinion, even if your opinion is wrong. He just posted it for all of us to see how wrong you are on everything, which in turn, you have debunked yourself.
Go away you silly person. Just here for a good laugh.