I have a problem with a video that claims to show one thing, but I have no proof it actually shows the thing it claims.
The video maker has a vested interest in proving himself right. The video is cut and edited so I can’t see how many people actually did recognize Biden.
He could have had a thousand takes over three weeks and just used the four people who embarrassed themselves for his video.
The video isn’t the problem because it’s a video. It’s a problem because I can’t verify how he made this video.
And as a researcher, the methodology behind any evidence is crucial to understanding the credibility of that evidence. Absolutely, unimpeachably crucial.
I don’t have a problem with a video.
I have a problem with a video that claims to show one thing, but I have no proof it actually shows the thing it claims.
The video maker has a vested interest in proving himself right. The video is cut and edited so I can’t see how many people actually did recognize Biden.
He could have had a thousand takes over three weeks and just used the four people who embarrassed themselves for his video.
The video isn’t the problem because it’s a video. It’s a problem because I can’t verify how he made this video.
And as a researcher, the methodology behind any evidence is crucial to understanding the credibility of that evidence. Absolutely, unimpeachably crucial.
I don’t like spending that much taxpayer money on debunking a TikTok video.