Now this, Frens, is a serious CONUNDRUM!!🤔😂🤣
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Tacitus was born in year 55... Jesus was allegedly crucified in year 30.
Thus Tacitus wasn't an eye-witness of Jesus.
Hearsay must be evidence to you.
No one said Tacitus was an "eyewitness."
Having a secular source mention Jesus (among others) only 20+ years after Jesus lived is enormous when discussing literature from early antiquity.
It's not hearsay - it's history.
And isn't evidence Jesus existed.
Be patient. It’s coming. Fast👍
What would count as evidence for you? What's your standard of historical validation form the 1st century??