Now this, Frens, is a serious CONUNDRUM!!🤔😂🤣
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Tacitus was born in year 55... Jesus was allegedly crucified in year 30.
Thus Tacitus wasn't an eye-witness of Jesus.
Hearsay must be evidence to you.
No one said Tacitus was an "eyewitness."
Having a secular source mention Jesus (among others) only 20+ years after Jesus lived is enormous when discussing literature from early antiquity.
It's not hearsay - it's history.
And isn't evidence Jesus existed.
Be patient. It’s coming. Fast👍
Maranatha!!!!
What would count as evidence for you? What's your standard of historical validation form the 1st century??
You understand that lies can be written in books and then repeated as if they're fact for centuries, right?
Words on paper aren't evidence of anything due to that. There will always be room for skepticism with that format... Always.