Remember this "Conspiracy Theory"?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Dec 18 2019: “Storing medical information below the skin’s surface. Specialized dye, delivered along with a vaccine, could enable “on-patient’ storage of vaccination history." https://archive.vn/Q2Vmv (Currently used on animals fixed at the humane society.)
Oct 2020 or earlier The Commons Project https://archive.vn/4JPy8 CommonPass https://archive.vn/r2myl
Oct 5 2020 Could Someone Hack My Microchip Implant? https://archive.vn/Y7ngI
Oct 12 2020: “2035: Work From Home IF You Get Microchipped” https://archive.vn/r1avM From the article "“Even if you stay locked up in your 200 square foot apartment working from home, you’re still going to have to have that chip. Like the New England Journal of Medicine was saying about vaccines, they’ll go through the employers to enforce this. If you don’t get your chip and vaccine you won’t even have a job from home. Gates has that angle covered as well.”
Nov 26 2020: “We won’t force vaccine; but here’s what we will do” https://archive.vn/rzXDN From the article “Government won’t force you to take vaccine. Amazon will. Airlines will. Banks will. You won’t be able to buy, sell, or trade without the vaccine."
Nov 30 2020: "UK GOVT TO ROLL OUT ‘VACCINE STAMPS’ IN PASSPORTS BY NEXT YEAR: REPORT” https://archive.vn/D1ZmN
Archived Dec 4 2020 "Can your employer require you to get a COVID-19 vaccine to go to work? Since the virus is deemed a direct threat, employers have more leeway on imposing rules” https://archive.vn/Y7ngI (from the article "If you're wondering whether your employer can require you to get a covid vaccine to return to work, the short answer is yes. But that doesn't mean employers won't face a "legal minefield" if and when they decide to implement a vaccination policy.”)
Dec 4 2020: “What’s with the Government COVID Vaccine Cards?” https://archive.vn/tkM7J Reason provided: "“The two leading vaccine candidates from Pfizer and Moderna each require two doses. In addition, the immunizations are not interchangeable, so it is critical people know which vaccine they’ve received before getting their second shots” (note article from Jan 2 2021 saying mixing vaccines is ok. https://archive.vn/cM0ga )
Dec 6 2020 “‘No Vaccine, No Work’ - Employers Discuss Making COVID Immunity Mandatory For Workers” https://archive.vn/Io1Cw
Dec 9 2020 “Precursor To The Mark? A ‘Vaccination Mark’ Under The Skin Now Being Developed” https://archive.vn/WAQnl
Dec 24 2020: “Former Cdc Director Says Covid-19 ‘Immunity Passports' Could Help U.S. Get ‘Back To New Normal’ https://archive.vn/KnDjn
Archived Dec 26 2020 “Global corporations rolling out ‘digital passports’ tying vaccine history to personal IDs: What’s coming next under ‘Great Reset’?(sic)” https://archive.vn/jcT49
Dec 29 2020: "Spain is keeping a list of everyone who refuses a Covid-19 vaccine and will share it with other EU countries” https://archive.vn/0xps0
Jan 2 2021 "England health officials defend contingency plan to mix Covid Vaccines” https://archive.vn/cM0ga
Scheduled for Oct 1 2021 No Flights without passport or “Real Id”https://archive.ph/YLci9
Awesome. Keep logging to it(?). I’m saving this 👍🏼
Graphic is wrong.
......should be on the left hand.....or forehead.
It’s right.
I got into a huge fight with a friend last year because she couldn't see that masks were just the start, conditioning for requiring vaccines to enter restaurants/stores. I just dont understand how people cant make these connections?! I realize now after a year 1/2 of this BS it's not that they can't see, it's that they don't want to. Cognitive dissonance.
I'd love to see threads that people saved where people were calling vaccine passports a conspiracy theory last year.
There was a great meme on here yesterday that said something like...conspiracy theories should be renamed as spoiler alerts 🐸👌
Ha, Had this very conversation with my pastor today, He had a great sermon on end times on Sunday, he thinks we are in End Times, but STILL thinks we need to “obey the governing authorities” and follows CDC guidelines. Talk about Cognitive Dissonance...
Businesses have trouble now getting workers. Wait until the vaccine mandate and micro chipping.
I remember it every day when things that were supposed to be just "Slippery Slope" fallacies/conspiracies keep coming true. Like drag queen story hour run by sex offenders. Mainstream society is satanic in so many ways, there is no way around that.
So-called "slippery slope" fallacy isn't that "any insinuation of a slippery slope or inevitable progression is fallacious". It's moreso multiple different fallacies that can occur when making a slippery slope argument, which, if done correctly, IS logically valid.
Here are some examples of fallacious "slippery slope" arguments, most obvious to least:
1.) "If we allow Bob to eat all of the peanut butter, we will no longer have peanut butter. If we no longer have peanut butter, we will go mad and kill each other."
This is fallacious because it is a non-sequitur; there is no explicit logic that connects mad murder sprees with loss of peanut butter, and there is no absolutism that that will be the outcome and not some alternative outcome.
2.) "If we run out of food in our home, we will surely perish."
This is also fallacious. The connective logic here is actually visible this time, though; it is true that most human beings will die of starvation if deprived of food for too long. What isn't true is that death is the absolute result of running out of food in our home; the alternative may be something like "we will visit the store as a result and buy more food".
Here is that last argument presented logically and soundly:
"If we run out of food in our home, we may perish."
It doesn't presume the outcome IS death, it just asserts that that is one possible outcome of that situation or event, which is correct. It's not likely you'd die of starvation if you have food, but it becomes more likely if you do not currently have food.
The argument made by this meme IS logically sound. It is not explicitly asserting that that IS the outcome or the only outcome, rather it's pointing to the fact that, by allowing the prior things, you are setting a precedent which would enable the final thing. You are enabling things closer and closer to that final one, which makes it more of a possibility, especially if not sufficiently resisted. It also harkens to the motives of actions; the idea being that, if people in power have motivations to impose the prior things, they (more) likely have motivations to impose the final.