well think of it from his perspective. He has 37TB of packet data....he got it from random dude that needs to remain anonymous as this person must have security clearance well beyond "going public with 37TB" Mike needs a way to verify the data without....."I paid some dude to make it show what i wanted". He is questioning himself at this point. He is doing it right. If he goes to court and it comes out then that he was had....well that would be a disaster.
And i don't think the data will be damaged. He won't just use the original copy. Court will be in due time....and i am worried about the security of people having this data off site. A lot of data can be pulled from a packet capture...that is where security can be an issue for the machines that got caught up in the capture.
well think of it from his perspective. He has 37TB of packet data....he got it from random dude that needs to remain anonymous as this person must have security clearance well beyond "going public with 37TB" Mike needs a way to verify the data without....."I paid some dude to make it show what i wanted". He is questioning himself at this point. He is doing it right. If he goes to court and it comes out then that he was had....well that would be a disaster.
And i don't think the data will be damaged. He won't just use the original copy. Court will be in due time....and i am worried about the security of people having this data off site. A lot of data can be pulled from a packet capture...that is where security can be an issue for the machines that got caught up in the capture.