No, of course it's not suspicious. And I'm 100% sure the next test will be based on an actual gene sequence as opposed to one composed by computer heuristics, and "researcher" assumptions.
I figure the next 'new' shiny test will magically detect antibodies (but won't find any) as well as detect every single variant even the ones that haven't happened yet.
Detect antibodies after flipping epidemiology on its head. The presence of antibodies used to mean that you had immunity, now it will mean that you are infected.
Right, it was, but the 'next' one can't just be substituted? We have to wait 5 months until the end of the year. Not suspicious at all.
No, of course it's not suspicious. And I'm 100% sure the next test will be based on an actual gene sequence as opposed to one composed by computer heuristics, and "researcher" assumptions.
I figure the next 'new' shiny test will magically detect antibodies (but won't find any) as well as detect every single variant even the ones that haven't happened yet.
Detect antibodies after flipping epidemiology on its head. The presence of antibodies used to mean that you had immunity, now it will mean that you are infected.