You can tell it was the real Fauci during the hearing by watching his reactions. He was shaking because he is painfully aware of his days being numbered.
I love these "clone" posts because we get a new one every week and they all feature a low-resolution, blurred dull potato-photo compared to a high contrast, high-resolution photo with a bright light source.
Occasionally one of the photos are horizontally flipped for extra-excitement.
Why nobody reads the title? I'm not considering clone. If you see the high res pic he has skin problems that are very clear, now check the video, even in HD his skin pristine.
The shapes of the inner ears are exactly the same. It's the same person. Left pic is high res, right pic is a still from a shitty video that's over saturated. Come on man.
Lighting and contrast settings on the camera make a huge difference. That's why Hillary had her podium fitted with a special light during the debate to make her look better.
Compressed video vs high quality photograph.
And it still looks like the same guy!
Different image resolution.
You can tell it was the real Fauci during the hearing by watching his reactions. He was shaking because he is painfully aware of his days being numbered.
The nose changed too, what happended to the indentation in the middle of his nose
Makeup for TV? He thinks himself as a celebrity after all.
Yeah it could be makeup after all
I love these "clone" posts because we get a new one every week and they all feature a low-resolution, blurred dull potato-photo compared to a high contrast, high-resolution photo with a bright light source.
Occasionally one of the photos are horizontally flipped for extra-excitement.
Got a new human suit to hide the lizard scales..
Why nobody reads the title? I'm not considering clone. If you see the high res pic he has skin problems that are very clear, now check the video, even in HD his skin pristine.
This Guy is 80 years old!!
Hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amByoZ-O4rA
Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Fauci
I realized this when watching the video.
Source?
The shapes of the inner ears are exactly the same. It's the same person. Left pic is high res, right pic is a still from a shitty video that's over saturated. Come on man.
Yes, there's a lot of difference when comparing a clear, high-resolution, high-contrast photo with a blurry, desaturated image of the same person.
Maybe he got a chemical peel on his face that got rid of some age spots. Still looks like the same nasty wicked old evil goblin underneath.
Lighting and contrast settings on the camera make a huge difference. That's why Hillary had her podium fitted with a special light during the debate to make her look better.
No.