That is all
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
It was largely rhetorical. Anyone who has a modicum of true science in them knows all about the dating methods and the problems associated with them. Your statement that the age of the earth not being in dispute reveals that your are neither a scientist nor a person that understands what science is all about. Very, very and I stress very few things are undisputed.
No, it doesn't. What it reveals is that the age of the earth is not in serious dispute at the moment by people who understand what science is about. It's in dispute by people who use a literal interpretation of the Bible to date the earth instead of relying on actual methodologies that have proven accurate for decades.
Current methodologies are always subject to challenge, using further experimentation, data collection, reporting of results, and replication, which is part of the scientific method I explained to you earlier.
There are a lot of things not "in serious dispute" at all times that are absolutely wrong. Seeing as you do not understand this, I'll just stop talking to you.
How's that read, ya prick
Ah yes, the ad hominem attack, the pinnacle of scientific discourse.
Dismissed.