You are being disingenuous to say I said it must be regularly preached from the pulpit and nothing else.
Ummm no, that's not what I said and that wasn't your original position. Quit moving goal posts and misrepresenting me.
The topic was preached at all on a every pulpit.
Nobody is talking about fluff. Again a misrepresentation. I specifically said preaching against sin and I also mentioned repentance. You're ignoring those out of intellectual dishonesty.
I agree there's people that don't know about the NWO. What I disagree with you is the fact that every single church ministry needs to be preaching that subject to be a real Church by your definition which is not present in Scripture.
You still refuse to acknowledge and address the examples that I gave that completely go contrary to your position.
Damn right I make a great Protestant. I make a better reformed Baptist.
And the way you're adding requirements that don't appear in God's word makes you a great Catholic. Will you be selling indulgences as well? Maybe you should get some red shoes like the Pope.
And you’re a gullible fool if you think we “sell indulgences”.
The catholic church used to sell indulgencies. It's a historical fact and one of the many things that lead to the Protestant revolt and the Reformation.
Why do you have a problem with me using examples of Catholics making up unBiblical standards when you've been doing it too? You opened this door by calling me a Protestant as if it was an insult.
Nope now you are adding all sorts of qualifiers to your original statement / position. Deceptive!
Original assertion:
If your church isn’t right now preaching against the Mark of the Beast, the Deep State, scamDemic, Communist China, “Vaccine” Passports, the Jab is contrary to Moral Law & therefor a SIN, you’re in the wrong church.
New assertion:
The jab is the Mark of the Beast or the forerunner to it. Any and all clergy better be warning its flock against that satanic mark! If your preacherman is too timid or too lazy or worried the collection plate might be lacking or thinks it’s not appropriate because of meh feelinz, THEN YOU ARE IN THE WRONG DAMNED CHURCH.
That's called "moving the goalposts" AND a straw-man fallacy and you're own words have shown you are being dishonest and lack integrity befitting a Christian.
More intellectually dishonesty. At this point I'm wondering if it may just be that you're not bright enough to consistently represent yourself correctly and recall your earlier assertions.
Those 2 statements have several different qualifiers. The fact that you are ignoring YOUR OWN WORDS compared side by side shows you are about as honest as a liberal.
You think the churches can just get away with half-assing it, don’t talk about the Mark of the Beast, don’t warn the Flock
No you dishonest jackass, I'm saying that it's not a Biblical requirement to be a "church" and gave some PRIME examples that you NEVER addressed. AND I told you we talk about it in my church.
Dumbass trying to misrepresent me and make it a Protestant church / gospel position.
You don't go to a church bud, you go to a Catholic synagogue of satan.
Ummm no, that's not what I said and that wasn't your original position. Quit moving goal posts and misrepresenting me.
The topic was preached at all on a every pulpit.
Nobody is talking about fluff. Again a misrepresentation. I specifically said preaching against sin and I also mentioned repentance. You're ignoring those out of intellectual dishonesty.
I agree there's people that don't know about the NWO. What I disagree with you is the fact that every single church ministry needs to be preaching that subject to be a real Church by your definition which is not present in Scripture.
You still refuse to acknowledge and address the examples that I gave that completely go contrary to your position.
Damn right I make a great Protestant. I make a better reformed Baptist.
And the way you're adding requirements that don't appear in God's word makes you a great Catholic. Will you be selling indulgences as well? Maybe you should get some red shoes like the Pope.
The catholic church used to sell indulgencies. It's a historical fact and one of the many things that lead to the Protestant revolt and the Reformation.
Why do you have a problem with me using examples of Catholics making up unBiblical standards when you've been doing it too? You opened this door by calling me a Protestant as if it was an insult.
Nope now you are adding all sorts of qualifiers to your original statement / position. Deceptive!
Original assertion:
New assertion:
That's called "moving the goalposts" AND a straw-man fallacy and you're own words have shown you are being dishonest and lack integrity befitting a Christian.
More intellectually dishonesty. At this point I'm wondering if it may just be that you're not bright enough to consistently represent yourself correctly and recall your earlier assertions.
Those 2 statements have several different qualifiers. The fact that you are ignoring YOUR OWN WORDS compared side by side shows you are about as honest as a liberal.
No you dishonest jackass, I'm saying that it's not a Biblical requirement to be a "church" and gave some PRIME examples that you NEVER addressed. AND I told you we talk about it in my church.
Dumbass trying to misrepresent me and make it a Protestant church / gospel position.
You don't go to a church bud, you go to a Catholic synagogue of satan.