You're insane, you know that. Call me a satanist because I simply want you to explain how you would go about doing what you claim to want to do. You're absolutely insane.

Why did those questions make you so uncomfortable? If you think nude photos should be banned, why not just say so instead of attacking me? I didn't say banning nude photos was a bad thing, I just wanted your opinion on it.

You can't just daydream, you need a plan. If you want to restrict porn, you need to know exactly what you're restricting or the government will use this power for evil. This is just how laws work, they need to be specific. Why does this offend you? You're so odd.

So last chance to show you have some semblance of thought going on up there; what law do you want applied exactly? Should any nudity be alllowed? If you restrict it to no sex acts only, things like Playboy will still slip through. Okay, so add a no nudity rule. That takes care of playboy, but now your no nudity rule also applies to art and movies. Do these things fall under no nudity or should there be an exception for nude art like paintings and stautes? Who decides what's "art" and what's porn then? What about PG-13 sex scenes in movies, should those fall under the porn restriction too? If your answer to all of this is yes ban it all, that's fine, I totally understand, I'm just curious how you would handle it because to me there doesn't seem to be an easy answer.

If you actually want this for society these are the questions you will have to answer. We need to know these things to make a law about it. Do you have an answer for these questions or will you just ignore them because thinking about them seems to make you angry for some insane reason.