But the fact that we have zero long-term data and that even without the corruption going on there is a non-zero chance that it could wipe out all of humanity.
It doesn't matter how infinitesimally small that probability is.
That is simply not a gamble worth taking, no matter how high the risk of a real pandemic would be.
Freedoms can be restored, at a price. Humanity can not if 100% of the population got vaccinated and it then turned out as terminal.
you are wrong.
Make an argument as to how.
Have you even read the thread?
sorry, thought it was obvious. even if it was going to cure all, liberty and freedom should always be the deciding factor if you are a free man, it is YOUR choice.. and no I read the first paragraph and made up my mind.
First paragraph was all i needed too. Tho I read it all.
Which makes you no different from a headline reading libtard.
I quote:
I was making a case against the mandatory vaccination. But since you're too arrogant and impulsive and instead of listening pretend that you are capable of reading minds you have demonstrated why the elites are capable of dividing us.
Good job.
sorry about your faulty start to your point, I don't have time to read everything. I read the first paragraph, so I'm not reading headlines, and you didn't write in a way that compelled me to go any further and I told you why. I was being nice. no need to be wordy, freedom and liberty, period.
To be fair the main bodybdidnt support your own premise so he really didn't need any more than the title. You are the guy that made your statement so definitive. "Single most important" based on that I think you are wrong.