🔥🔥UK GOVERNMENT RELEASE REPORT SHOWING VAXXED PEOPLE ARE 10X LIKELIER TO DIE FROM DELTA VARIANT.🔥🔥
(assets.publishing.service.gov.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
1.) What lab has actually isolated any covid variants to baseline a DNA genome sequence?
2.) W.H.O. put this out right? Do I even need to say any more?
The point is that Their own data is saying vaccinated people are 10x more likely.
But if you want papers on isolation here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT560525.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT019532 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036342/#!po=30.0000 https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.00543-20?permanently=true https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247524
Why am I not surprised the isolation was provided by the NIH last year?
And again, the WHO, pushed the pcr test for how long at levels So ridiculous that fruit came down positive? My point is who believes anything they all say now?
BTW, I think all versions of the jab are insane and dangerous.
I agree. Likely the jab is whats leading to the 10x increase in death for vaccined due to ADE
This is not isolation. Sure the word is (mis)used. These are cell cultures, what passes for isolation in the world of virology.
The first link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947 is literally the sequence. "attaaaggtt tataccttcc caggtaacaa accaaccaac tttcgatctc ttgtagatct..." etc
Yes, a computer generated sequence. It is not reality. The sequence was not pulled directly out of an organism, it was composed from found RNA fragments along with fragments mined from a genome database to fill the many holes. The pieces are assembled by computer heuristics. A heuristic can not guarantee that what results is real. Unlike a jigsaw puzzle, a bioinformatic puzzle will have many possible ways of being put together, and there is no final picture to act as a sanity check. It's all biased assumptions and random selections.