You've done as admirable a job as one could, given the circumstances. As others have said, there are always going to be people who refuse to believe or understand Q research.
To be honest, the folks that grind my gears are the ones that take over-the-top bullshit and try to misattribute it to Q (i.e. "I SAW THIS ARTICLE ON REAL RAW NEWS, IS THIS Q OR IS THIS FAKE LULZ").
I truly believe anyone who posts from realrawnews is clearly either:
a low-effort disinfo shill
truly too stupid to post here - they can and should continue to read, and learn, but zero discernment means they have nothing constructive to contribute to a truth-focused community
At this point, given the layout of articles on Real Raw News, it wouldn't surprise me if a neural network writes all their articles.
Toss in a few inputs, some name drops, and out comes an article of pure fantasy.
For what purpose, I'm not sure. But it definitely seems like someone from 200 years into the future is lazily writing a history book and is getting all the facts and figures completely out of order and proportion.
You've done as admirable a job as one could, given the circumstances. As others have said, there are always going to be people who refuse to believe or understand Q research.
To be honest, the folks that grind my gears are the ones that take over-the-top bullshit and try to misattribute it to Q (i.e. "I SAW THIS ARTICLE ON REAL RAW NEWS, IS THIS Q OR IS THIS FAKE LULZ").
I truly believe anyone who posts from realrawnews is clearly either:
Accurate.
At this point, given the layout of articles on Real Raw News, it wouldn't surprise me if a neural network writes all their articles.
Toss in a few inputs, some name drops, and out comes an article of pure fantasy.
For what purpose, I'm not sure. But it definitely seems like someone from 200 years into the future is lazily writing a history book and is getting all the facts and figures completely out of order and proportion.
Time will tell, I guess.