We are entering a Grand Solar Minimum, for the next 50-60 years or more. Such events cause mass starvation and disease that accompanies a lack of sufficient sunshine to grow crops. Check out Dr Zharkova on the data analysis.
Re: impact from an invisible 'planet'
Sure, the earth has had cataclysmic events, such as the one 11500 years ago, and the burning and floods that accompanied it, is documented in the bible.
For those trying to prove that it happened more recently: The biblical timelines may be distorted. I still have difficulty believing Methuselah's age (969 years). Nevertheless, A devastating flood happened.
I have not seen any cyclical evidence of cataclysmic impacts, geologically speaking. So, how to predict them is obscure. So, I believe that narrative to be nonsense: not because impacts don't happen, but because it is labelled as invisible, but certain, and tied to the current behaviour of the elites.
Nevertheless, A devastating flood happened. I have not seen any cyclical evidence of cataclysmic impacts, geologically speaking.
Graham Hancock speculated, with evidence, that there was a giant meteor/comet impact around 12,000 years ago that caused a giant wave of water to pass across the globe. Then the impact crater was found that backed up his claims.
Here is Graham Hancock writing about this in the Daily Mail.
Additionally, there is evidence that we are overdue for a pole reversal on Earth. This links into the Electroverse theory that says that the universe is controlled by by electro-magnetic energy that is produced by Suns and that charges the magnetic fields of planets that protects the planets from intergalactic particles.
The weakening Sun (Grand Solar Minimum) will lead to another little ice age that may also include a pole reversal.
This is where the latest and most modern climate science is focussed. Well, for the serious scientists, anyway.
By the way, China has the longest record of sunspot data (sunspots are an easy way to observe how active the Sun is at any particular time) and know exactly what is coming.
yes, agreed. Graham was maligned for years, it was satisfying to see him vindicated. Note that I said 'cyclical', so I know about impacts, including the one described by you, but I don't believe there is a pattern that has been found, yet.
Well, Hancock came up with a theory that there was a massive impact 12,000 years ago. Then years later the impact crater was found proving his hypothesis correct.
The Grand Solar Minimum is now largely accepted science. We had a solar minimum that triggered the little ice age, so the data and history supports this theory as well.
There is a reason that all of this is happening now.
We talk about dynasties that are thousands of years old but at the same time some people here reject the idea of knowledge that is thousands of years old being kept hidden from the masses.
The evidence is quite overwhelming, but you are free to believe what you want to believe.
We are entering a Grand Solar Minimum, for the next 50-60 years or more. Such events cause mass starvation and disease that accompanies a lack of sufficient sunshine to grow crops. Check out Dr Zharkova on the data analysis. Re: impact from an invisible 'planet' Sure, the earth has had cataclysmic events, such as the one 11500 years ago, and the burning and floods that accompanied it, is documented in the bible. For those trying to prove that it happened more recently: The biblical timelines may be distorted. I still have difficulty believing Methuselah's age (969 years). Nevertheless, A devastating flood happened. I have not seen any cyclical evidence of cataclysmic impacts, geologically speaking. So, how to predict them is obscure. So, I believe that narrative to be nonsense: not because impacts don't happen, but because it is labelled as invisible, but certain, and tied to the current behaviour of the elites.
Graham Hancock speculated, with evidence, that there was a giant meteor/comet impact around 12,000 years ago that caused a giant wave of water to pass across the globe. Then the impact crater was found that backed up his claims.
Here is Graham Hancock writing about this in the Daily Mail.
Additionally, there is evidence that we are overdue for a pole reversal on Earth. This links into the Electroverse theory that says that the universe is controlled by by electro-magnetic energy that is produced by Suns and that charges the magnetic fields of planets that protects the planets from intergalactic particles.
The weakening Sun (Grand Solar Minimum) will lead to another little ice age that may also include a pole reversal.
This is where the latest and most modern climate science is focussed. Well, for the serious scientists, anyway.
By the way, China has the longest record of sunspot data (sunspots are an easy way to observe how active the Sun is at any particular time) and know exactly what is coming.
yes, agreed. Graham was maligned for years, it was satisfying to see him vindicated. Note that I said 'cyclical', so I know about impacts, including the one described by you, but I don't believe there is a pattern that has been found, yet.
Well, Hancock came up with a theory that there was a massive impact 12,000 years ago. Then years later the impact crater was found proving his hypothesis correct.
The Grand Solar Minimum is now largely accepted science. We had a solar minimum that triggered the little ice age, so the data and history supports this theory as well.
There is a reason that all of this is happening now.
We talk about dynasties that are thousands of years old but at the same time some people here reject the idea of knowledge that is thousands of years old being kept hidden from the masses.
The evidence is quite overwhelming, but you are free to believe what you want to believe.