For what it’s worth, I have absolutely no intention of trying to save any of you from your beliefs. No point. There’s a deadline on Q, and if by 2024 we haven’t seen Trump back in office and you guys vindicated, then clearly either Q wasn’t real, or the Plan failed.
Either way, it requires absolutely no work from me to prove you wrong, so I’m not accepting that responsibility.
First thing, Q research is not a "belief", let's get that out of the way, that's a petty way of trying to categorize the research and investigation as some sort of cult or religion.
Next, if you aren't trying to convince people that Q is wrong, then what is the point of posting anything about it -- truly? If you aren't, then it is strictly trolling and/or doing it for the luls, it comes down to a simple binary choice. There might a third option of possibly being obstinate b/c it makes sense but that causes inner turmoil against all you know.
Either way, it requires absolutely no work from me to prove you wrong, so I’m not accepting that responsibility.
You don't need to accept the responsibility as that has no correlation here, regardless you are trying to prove the movement wrong from a sideways direction. Do you want to see things get worse? Are you that full of yourself to be correct that you want to see America fall? If this country falls, we're all going to be in trouble, if you believe that you or others like you will be saved for "bringing down Q people", you are sorely mistaken, you will be in the bread lines and slave camps with us. I would posit that you don't know the term "useful idiot". The cabal is a club that everyday people are not a part of my friend.
I’ve said before that one of us is so embarrassingly wrong that we are causing actual social harm.
Could be me. Could be you. Time will tell.
Of course I don’t want the country to fail. I am just not convinced that it’s in as much danger as you seem to believe and as much danger as Trump and Q claim.
I’ve been enormously open about why I am here. We both see the same things and come to different conclusions. I want to know why.
Which is why I write long, detailed posts about why I can’t accept a piece of evidence. Because I want to see if I’m missing something, or if you’re missing something, or if there’s a hidden nonfalsifiablity variable mucking everything up for one or both of us.
I have no interest in converting you or proving you wrong.
Unlike most “conspiracy theories”, Q has a deadline. Nobody here likes to openly datefag, but this can’t go on in limbo forever. If by some date in the very near future Trump isn’t back in office, then you were wrong.
If he does end up back in office before 2024, then I was wrong.
Time is doing the heavy lifting in Q world debunking. I don’t have to do anything. I’m just going to wait.
Ok, that is acceptable, real answers are always best. I'll give a bit of inside info myself. I wasn't real keen on Q at the beginning. I've always been a skeptic, never thought the 9/11 story was real, etc.
Pardon the length here. A friend of mine who I've known for 30+ yrs asked me one day if I had heard of the "book of Q", the original one which contained the early drops, not the newer, lengthier one. My response was no I hadn't, he then goes on to explain a bit about it and it sounded like typical 4chan social engineering to me -- I didn't give another though until the next week when he mentioned it again. I knew he would keep bringing it up b/c he is persistent, but at the same time this man is one of the most logical people I have known, not exactly prone to whims and conspiracy theory, he is the penultimate "show me the data" person. I read the pdf he sent me, and I still wasn't convinced, I read it another 3 times with the last using a different perspective. I threw out the Hillary being arrested as it hadn't happened, perhaps something in the future. The rest of it what was being posted was simply setting the framework -- akin to hearing "this will be important later on in calculus" when taking algebra. Anyways, it was interesting, especially the remarks about NoName. The one thing that really stood out, was the format, the posts asked quetions, not giving defacto statements -- the posts encouraged thinking and research from the start. Then the Saudi purge happened, and I was convinced there was more to this than simply a well informed individual posting possibly sketchy info.
If you have time to read/post here, do this then if you would, watch Ultimate Qproofs, youtube nuked it off the site again, which should say something in and of itself. Or read the Book of Q proofs on the resources lower right side margin. If you can't take the time to see what the "opposition" has to offer, it creates quite difficult circumstances in which to dialogue if one side is always saying "that isn't correct" when they haven't looked at the data. I read lots of lefty blogs and articles, talked to lots of lefties, so I know for myself how they think, I am not taking someone else's opinion from a news site or conservative opinion. I think it's fair for the left to do the same.
I don't like using dates either, it sets up the fence sitters for an emotional fall, plus the world is dynamic with trillions of moving parts.
For what it’s worth, I have absolutely no intention of trying to save any of you from your beliefs. No point. There’s a deadline on Q, and if by 2024 we haven’t seen Trump back in office and you guys vindicated, then clearly either Q wasn’t real, or the Plan failed.
Either way, it requires absolutely no work from me to prove you wrong, so I’m not accepting that responsibility.
First thing, Q research is not a "belief", let's get that out of the way, that's a petty way of trying to categorize the research and investigation as some sort of cult or religion.
Next, if you aren't trying to convince people that Q is wrong, then what is the point of posting anything about it -- truly? If you aren't, then it is strictly trolling and/or doing it for the luls, it comes down to a simple binary choice. There might a third option of possibly being obstinate b/c it makes sense but that causes inner turmoil against all you know.
You don't need to accept the responsibility as that has no correlation here, regardless you are trying to prove the movement wrong from a sideways direction. Do you want to see things get worse? Are you that full of yourself to be correct that you want to see America fall? If this country falls, we're all going to be in trouble, if you believe that you or others like you will be saved for "bringing down Q people", you are sorely mistaken, you will be in the bread lines and slave camps with us. I would posit that you don't know the term "useful idiot". The cabal is a club that everyday people are not a part of my friend.
I’ve said before that one of us is so embarrassingly wrong that we are causing actual social harm.
Could be me. Could be you. Time will tell.
Of course I don’t want the country to fail. I am just not convinced that it’s in as much danger as you seem to believe and as much danger as Trump and Q claim.
I’ve been enormously open about why I am here. We both see the same things and come to different conclusions. I want to know why.
Which is why I write long, detailed posts about why I can’t accept a piece of evidence. Because I want to see if I’m missing something, or if you’re missing something, or if there’s a hidden nonfalsifiablity variable mucking everything up for one or both of us.
I have no interest in converting you or proving you wrong.
Unlike most “conspiracy theories”, Q has a deadline. Nobody here likes to openly datefag, but this can’t go on in limbo forever. If by some date in the very near future Trump isn’t back in office, then you were wrong.
If he does end up back in office before 2024, then I was wrong.
Time is doing the heavy lifting in Q world debunking. I don’t have to do anything. I’m just going to wait.
Ok, that is acceptable, real answers are always best. I'll give a bit of inside info myself. I wasn't real keen on Q at the beginning. I've always been a skeptic, never thought the 9/11 story was real, etc.
Pardon the length here. A friend of mine who I've known for 30+ yrs asked me one day if I had heard of the "book of Q", the original one which contained the early drops, not the newer, lengthier one. My response was no I hadn't, he then goes on to explain a bit about it and it sounded like typical 4chan social engineering to me -- I didn't give another though until the next week when he mentioned it again. I knew he would keep bringing it up b/c he is persistent, but at the same time this man is one of the most logical people I have known, not exactly prone to whims and conspiracy theory, he is the penultimate "show me the data" person. I read the pdf he sent me, and I still wasn't convinced, I read it another 3 times with the last using a different perspective. I threw out the Hillary being arrested as it hadn't happened, perhaps something in the future. The rest of it what was being posted was simply setting the framework -- akin to hearing "this will be important later on in calculus" when taking algebra. Anyways, it was interesting, especially the remarks about NoName. The one thing that really stood out, was the format, the posts asked quetions, not giving defacto statements -- the posts encouraged thinking and research from the start. Then the Saudi purge happened, and I was convinced there was more to this than simply a well informed individual posting possibly sketchy info.
If you have time to read/post here, do this then if you would, watch Ultimate Qproofs, youtube nuked it off the site again, which should say something in and of itself. Or read the Book of Q proofs on the resources lower right side margin. If you can't take the time to see what the "opposition" has to offer, it creates quite difficult circumstances in which to dialogue if one side is always saying "that isn't correct" when they haven't looked at the data. I read lots of lefty blogs and articles, talked to lots of lefties, so I know for myself how they think, I am not taking someone else's opinion from a news site or conservative opinion. I think it's fair for the left to do the same.
I don't like using dates either, it sets up the fence sitters for an emotional fall, plus the world is dynamic with trillions of moving parts.