Since I firmly believe Covid was a Psyop glommed onto the seasonal flu, I have made significantly different conclusions than most:
1 ) The VAX is either the seasonal flu shot, an inert placebo, or a mixture of both. This would explain rapid development, far ahead of projections. POTUS45 not only created enormous leverage by disrupting the timeline, he baited the Pharms into massive fraud.
2 ) Reported numbers of people dying from the VAX are highly inflated. I suspect this is a White Hat operation to undermine public trust in the narrative, accelerating the conclusion of the Covid Psyop. It has been highly effective, imho.
3 ) The hysterical and unbelievable Delta Scarient spread is the Cabal counter to #2. Unlike the outset of the Psyop, Governors are prevented from putting down their nursing home populations and spiking deaths. This has created a shortage of dead bodies, hence the fear porn about 'cases' and unsupported hype in the MSM.
My wife got the flu shot for 15 years, but caught the flu 5-6 times during that period. The last time she got in 2016, her lower left leg swelled up like a balloon for nearly 6 weeks. I have never had the flu shot and have not had the flu since childhood. I convinced her to stop. She has not caught 'covid' and has not had a flu since 2016.
The flu shot portion of my theory could explain adverse and anticipated side effects.
You did nothing to damage my theory.
The adverse effects this time around seems way more widespread that the flu jab. Honestly, I don't think TPTB would pass up this opportunity to accomplish one of their long term goals for the planet, like depopulation. I think there is something very much worth being afraid of in that shot. Not enough time as passed yet to see the full fall out of this thing. Sterility, lifetime disabilities, early death,,,,,, something is coming for many of the people who took the vax.
except you joined less than a day ago and all your comments are suspect
Nevertheless, the fear over getting the shot HELPS the cause and supports the conclusion of the submission.
It's a bullet proof point.
I am not trying to damage your theory. I am saying it does not match the data. Hypothesizing a flu shot in order to justify a few ordinary adverse reactions does not provide any reasonable explanation for the clotting and cardiovascular problems associated with this one. You could just as easily hypothesize any vaccine shot. Why not HPV instead of flu? They all have minimal adverse reactions. But they don't give rise to myocarditis, etc. in the numbers we are seeing.
numbers lol
that is hilarious
what numbers?