Edit: Here's a video for context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w58_rNmavAA
Did they have hopes they could disparage "Trump's Vaccine" and push theirs on the original time-line, after years of crippling lockdowns?
I think that could be a sufficient assessment of what is playing out now.
They didn't want a vaccine just yet, they needed a couple variants to go through so that, after 5+ years (like Trump keeps saying) of lockdowns and crippling policies, they can come in like a savior and easily convince everyone to take the "vaccines" to end the nightmare. I'm sure some of us, especially the family members we've had to talk out of killing themselves, would have fallen for that bait after years of abuse.
Maybe that was the original game plan and Trump pushing for the "vaccines" wasn't even worthy of consideration. I figure they didn't expect for a moment Trump would usher many of his own to their deaths. Hell, WE still can't even grapple with that stark possibility.
Is it possible Trump called their bluff, more than just because he could Emergency Authorize it and therefore disqualify it from mandates?
Is it possible that not only did he take the Hunt for Red October torpedo early, such that it didn't have a chance to arm itself, but took it so early that their snap reaction was to try to bury his vaccines in favor of their "vaccines" 4 years from now?
Once they realized the "miracle vaccine" card was played and could never be played again, they jumped on board with Trump, begrudgingly, knowing they had to take this one and only chance to push their genocide agenda.
Figuratively, I'd figure that is like Trump sacrificing his queen for an early check on their king before the pawns have all managed to leave their posts.
From then on, every move they make to escape check just leaves them in yet another endless cycle of checks, while Trump mops up their helpless backlines. The pawns (ANTIFA/BLM/MSM) are all still intact, but their NWO medical ball-and-chain is now shattered, the election rigging is exposed, their control on the MSM is obvious, and the damage to the border and economy are exposed to broad daylight.
In other words, he effectively reached over the board and played their turn for them, and they collectively shat the bed trying to figure out how to escape it.
Did I crack the code this time? Thoughts?
The problem there is, of course, that Trump is STILL telling people that the vaccine is safe and saving lives and taking credit for it. Even after Biden. So if your point is correct, then that means either Trump turned, or that he has no reason to believe that the Deep State meddled with his fake vaccine and is still giving out saline, which means that the vaccine is perfectly safe, since it's just saline.
This has been addressed before as well.
https://qalerts.app/?n=4245
If he went against the "vaccines" then or now, he wouldn't just be up against our Media. He would be up against the World Media, and their Governments in tow.
By going against the "vaccines" he made, he would cause an international panic whose only recourse is to:
A. Demand his head for poisoning the world (the crime he was trying to mitigate).
B. They double down on the poison, because they well and truly wish to kill us, and say Trump is an international threat that must be silenced once and for all because he is "threatening OUR democracy" by his anti-vaccine rhetoric.
Either way he bites off more than he can chew, especially with everything else going on. I'll have you remember, he was silent for 2 months after the 20th. Barely a peep. It was necessary to avoid Media attention as best he could, because he has to get off the World stage such that his voice doesn't carry the same weight in other countries anymore.
He must look non-threatening so they can't pin a coup on him.
Ultimately, Trump CANNOT go up against the World Media and their Governments, especially out of power. He'd have to hire too many translators, and it is safe to say they would all easily be in the pocket of the Cabal.
Okay, so something COULD stop what was coming, then? Because that was option 2 in my original post. The Plan is much more fragile than Q suggested, and Trump was forced to release a poison (and to this day take credit for it) that will kill tens of millions of innocent Americans because otherwise, the Cabal would be able to prevent the Plan from happening by stopping Trump.
In other words, you believe that the Plan requires all these Americans to die while Trump continues to tell people it's fine? That's the only way to save the country? That's the the plan of good guys? Release a weapon that kills so many innocent people that it literally rewrites humanity?
I'm having a hard time with that. Blockbuster movies have been made fighting bad guys who had plans that killed far fewer people than most of you guys think the vaccine is killing.
"Oh no, my Sicilian defense failed, whatever shall I do?"
Said no chess player ever.
Variations upon variations.
Contingencies on contingencies.
No plan ever goes "according to plan."
That's why you memorize every play and make sure you remember more moves ahead than your foe on how they will manifest.
You can hope your foe falls for the fool's mate, where no pieces are taken, but if you use it and they know what to do, you're royally screwed.
WE ARE AT WAR! And the front lines is YOUR DOORSTEP. I don't think you understand that.
Yes. They killed themselves. Not Trump. Trump didn't hold them down and inject them. Optics wise, he made it, sure. He promoted it, sure. But he continues to say "It should be your choice."
And, yes ultimately their lives are his responsibility.
If Military strategy determines that his compliance with the "vaccines" is critical to success, then it is critical to success. Period.
You can't save them all, especially when so many are gung-ho about killing themselves.
Imagine this: An enemy lays a trap to guard a target, and you have boots on the ground in disguise ready to intercept. You manage to place a charge on the trap to disrupt it, but in doing so it draws the attention of a civilian. The civilian goes up to the charge to pick it up. Had the charge not been there, the civilian would have walked by.
You have several options, but these are clear:
Detonate the charge to disrupt the trap before the civilian can remove it, thereby putting the civilian at risk of the detonation but allowing you to move on the target with coordination.
Let the civilian pick up the charge and risk blowing himself up on the trap, alerting the target.
Tackle the civilian, take them to cover, and risk alerting the target, putting your men at risk now the disguise is blown, which will likely cost all your men their lives.
Now, you might expect me to say "you do this option..."
That's not how it works.
Someone has to be a leader, suck it up, and make a decision. They have to make a call and live with it and the consequences. That includes putting ALL your men in harms way on this very sensitive mission.
If the mission is more important than the life of the civilian, the path is clear in as much as it is justifiable to the leader. That's why we need good leaders, who make the tough calls when no one else has the balls to do so. If you pick the middle option, both the civilian dies and the target gets away. That is unacceptable.
You don't have to like it. But that's reality. Sacrifices must be made, and it takes LEADERSHIP to make those calls. Nothing is black and white, people are in harm's way, and if you have to go along with a genocidal pharmaceutical company in order to save 300 million lives at the cost of 30 million, then you are going to make that call, pray your estimates are higher than reality, and take that responsibility.
Because if you don't those 30 million will die anyways.
That’s a consistent position to hold. It’s the same one used to justify pretty much every bad thing that has ever happened on a mass scale in human history, but it is logically consistent.
But remember that if you’re expecting the families of all those people to undergo the Great Awakening after being told that their family members, all of them innocent, some of them Trump supporters, needed to be sacrificed by the millions in order to save the country, you probably aren’t going to get it.
Your civil war won’t be against the Deep State. It’ll be against everyone in this country who thinks that killing tens of millions of your own civilians (or letting them die through inaction) all in the name of some new world order is… war-worthy. Those are the people Trump would have to take down in addition to the Deep State, and those people have every reason to argue that a definitional war crime against an entire civilian population is not the way to save the county. I’d be one of them.
Or Trump and Biden do this together and covid is the storm.