2018 was weird for Q happenings. For instance, I am still mystified by the Q400 incident, where a Bombardier Q-400 was stolen, then crashed into a mysterious island with a seriously shady past. WTF, it even drew a Q on the flight radar screens. AND (thanks u/privatejoker), the guy that stole the plane and died shared his name with a decommissioned nuclear sub... that maybe was never decommissioned, after all....
The PING. Remember that island near Madagascar that was sending a ping that could be heard around the world every 17 seconds? WTF?
AF1 drawing figures in the sky, or outlining strange shapes beneath Arlington cemetery, that only the cabal would recognize still mystifies me. What was the message?
WTF went on with the CIA submarine? Was it sunk near Hawaii? Why did the USS Jimmy Carter return from a mission flying the Jolly Roger flag (navy tradition if you engaged and destroyed enemy assets)?
Lastly, Q supposedly talking to cabal players directly on the board was chilling. The "dying of thirst" exchange still gives me pause.
Oh. And what was that operation in Shanghai? The pic with the ONE blown-out (or maybe just open) window still bothers me. What happened?
Anyway, those are some of mine! What are some of yours?
It makes all the difference, and makes what you said complete nonsense. Q4881 applies here.
Whatever you think your point is.
Mine was already made, and I stand by it:
Q1 with its precise prediction of The Arrest was an interesting way to start the Q canon.
I never use the term Qanon. So Q4881 doesn't apply here. Get some sleep.
Seems you lack basic reading comprehension skills.
You're saying Q stated something, when it was actually "comments _theories _suggestions _statements" made by another anon.
When Q replies directly to other anons he always quotes them first. The original quote is included because that's how the chans work.
And he did this a lot. Strange you dont understand this by now.
LOL classic projection. Sorry, but nothing from you is insightful or new to me, since I was reading the Q posts in real time as they were posted on the chans. So unfortunately you wasted your time and emotional energy on this.
Hard to believe I have to explain this, but here's the way this type of social media works:
When you post what someone else wrote, by default it's a reaffirmation of it, unless you refute it. So, let's see whether Q reaffirms or refutes the statement in question.
An anon wrote:
...to which Q added (put on those reading comprehension glasses now):
Are you able to see how Q's remark in Q1 reaffirms and amplifes the anon's prediction of the arrest? This is the part you were having trouble with. Get it?
Maybe now you can begin to grasp the concept of why it makes zero difference who originally said "Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017." The reason it makes absolutely no difference is: Q reposted the prediction (reaffirmation) and then added more amplifying text in agreement with it (endorsement).
As such, my original reply to the OP still stands, unchanged.
When you reply again to this that Q didn't make the original prediction, it still won't matter then, any more than it does right now. Because he ENDORSED it. So you might want to stop embarrassing yourself about some anon saying "Q1 is interesting," and go direct that anger and frustration at something that actually matters.
I don't see it as Q reaffirming the anons post.
Anon says "arrested". Q says "extradited". Extradition isn't mutually exclusive with arrest.
The whole anon post and Q reply could've been cryptic comms for an ongoing op, or intentional misinformation to cause panic.
It could've been other patriot military trying to force Qs hand into action before acting themselves, with Qs reply reassuring them to stand down and they had their own decades old plan.
There was chatter in the early days that patriot military generals knew of Obamas treason, and were making plans to pull a Myanmar style coup and arrest him while he was president. But this would've ended in war. Q teams plan with Trump was more long-term and dedicated to minimal bloodshed.
But thats all conjecture by us civilians at this stage.
My issue is people putting words in Qs mouth. Many have incorrectly attributed that anons post to Q saying it, but the fact is Q did not.
Now I can see you know your stuff and aren't just talking out of your ass like many here, so no hard feelings patriot.