Not a chess, but a game engine. It uses a neural turing machine to process patterns. It solves cool problems where variable are limited and results can be reasonably known, like how to properly fold proteins.
If you seriously think that such a thing could ever learn even a single persons ever-changing mind then you don't understand how this AI is working.
"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."
"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."
Used on us? Like, on our minds? On our bodies? What did you mean? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?
"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."
You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.
Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this and any and all AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.
No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.
But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.
It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions, and then make self-contradicting statements as if you've forgotten your original argument completely.
We don't tolerate bullshit here. I'll continue to be harsh on you as long as you are unreasonable.
You have a point with mass control. I fully believe that is happening, but humans need to first be herded and trained into such a perfect mentality state in order for it to be most effective. That happened long before AI, and they have become the masters at doing it. It takes a human to interface with a human in order to break their will to submit into MKUltra level control. But individual thought, and a few mistakes on their part (internet), seems to have pervaded much more than they anticipated, and it is infectious. At most, 40-50% are under this type of predictable control. This following belief won't be the majority here, but I believe it is the Spirit of God that is selecting and allowing us to see through the suggestive mind control.
I appreciate your concern that I should maintain some skepticism with Q, and I'll assure you that if you saw the rest of my discussions with this individual, you would see how I've made it clear that the only thing I am not skeptical about is my Christianity, and that I present Q and any other theories as "seemingly most likely".
The point of the discussion was that there are plenty of explicit Q posts to focus on that serve as strong evidence to their validity.
Not a chess, but a game engine. It uses a neural turing machine to process patterns. It solves cool problems where variable are limited and results can be reasonably known, like how to properly fold proteins.
If you seriously think that such a thing could ever learn even a single persons ever-changing mind then you don't understand how this AI is working.
"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."
"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."
Used on us? Like, on our minds? On our bodies? What did you mean? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?
"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."
You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.
Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this and any and all AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.
No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.
But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.
It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions, and then make self-contradicting statements as if you've forgotten your original argument completely.
We don't tolerate bullshit here. I'll continue to be harsh on you as long as you are unreasonable.
You have a point with mass control. I fully believe that is happening, but humans need to first be herded and trained into such a perfect mentality state in order for it to be most effective. That happened long before AI, and they have become the masters at doing it. It takes a human to interface with a human in order to break their will to submit into MKUltra level control. But individual thought, and a few mistakes on their part (internet), seems to have pervaded much more than they anticipated, and it is infectious. At most, 40-50% are under this type of predictable control. This following belief won't be the majority here, but I believe it is the Spirit of God that is selecting and allowing us to see through the suggestive mind control.
I appreciate your concern that I should maintain some skepticism with Q, and I'll assure you that if you saw the rest of my discussions with this individual, you would see how I've made it clear that the only thing I am not skeptical about is my Christianity, and that I present Q and any other theories as "seemingly most likely".
The point of the discussion was that there are plenty of explicit Q posts to focus on that serve as strong evidence to their validity.