What is a shill, someone asked, and why are they banned on sight? Check out these two modmails we received from these glowie fuckwits. RETARDED. Do they think this taunts us? Or hurts our cause? WE ARE WINNING! 🇺🇸
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
They are spending substantial effort on an internet forum, a message board.
They are losing to words. They are losing to memes. They are losing to people sharing information and knowledge.
As long as they can't shut us up, we win. They are pathetic.
Not JUST a forum, but one that rails against their belief structure.
Why would you waste time in a place you're uncomfortable to be in, unless your doubts align with said forum?
Mods- please consider placing restrictions on user names. Shills and bots rely heavily on throw away names using lots of underscores, dashes and numbers.
Just make it so names require alphabetical characters only. At least they need to then think about what to name them selves because aaaahhhhiiiiijjj is obviously a shill.
It would also be extremely beneficial to make upvote and downvote history public. Then we can not only spot which accounts are inflammatory, but also write a script with java that parses user accounts and gives insights into which accounts are cooperating. Shills hate this idea and thus is almost always downvoted like crazy when ever I mention it.
Think double edged sword. Enabling the name thing is trivial, fine with me.
As for the rest, can you think of a reason not to do that, could it be weaponized against pedes?
You have to be careful about it but I think we can agree on certain words being verboten from user names that are very popular with glowies. I was pointing this out as well on Odysee when SaltyCracker's stream got brigaded by bots with so many predictable usernames that had Hitler or KKK somewhere in them. Disallowing certain things from usernames at least makes the bots and glowies have to work harder.
Good question, and my honest thought is I am not sure.
My inclination is the shills already know who they are, but we don’t know who we are. They identify us because we are not them.
My reference to this idea is back when theDonald launched, no one downvoted anyone, only shills who came in from reddit pissed off. They would get nuked into oblivion with down votes to the tune of 1000 to 1. Slowly as the brigadiers came in, that ratio went down and was turned on real patriots, frens and pedes. That made it impossible to quickly spot shills.
Also, names at launch were fun and creative. Almost never were there nonsensical names like we have today.
It is more subtle than that, but your name is a great example of a good one. It took some thought and has a meaning. Obviously not all do or have to, but bot accounts definitely exploit the loop hole with throw aways like justice_in_2020, things like that.
I may not be too tech savvy, but is such recognition algorithms easy to incorporate?
Yes, you can limit specific characters similar to requiring specific characters be present in a password.
Do am I shill for you ?!
About my "name" - I created it from random signs before I was understanding how those forum is working.I was fearing IP monitoring here,so those account was planed to be nuked after 1 month. Because it is working otherwise name stayed. Still don't like thing that I use one account allowing quite serious attribution in case enemies would use serious intelligence forces against us but situation is changed so much it probably not matters anyway.
Come on,we really need shills with such account activity recognised. Bad thing if those shill posts were completely removed as this time it was 130 days account of almost "undercover" shill. We shall analyse what they are doing here.
Looking at those shill mentioned - Probably good algorithm would be putting under mods observation old but almost not active accounts. But I would like to see those shill posts in the wild to recognise its modus operandi - counter-intelligence shall be applied.
If you want one example of a shill, i archived a page for you before this guy inevitability gets deported.
Textbook example, blames da joos for everything and fedbaits and gaslights what glowies do.
Says glowies only try to pacify us when they have been proven to get us to say things they can arrest us for like the govenor kidnapping set up.
Is fedbaiting us in another thread to say we will do something violent.
Hates all jews.
If this isn't a glowie it's a larping moron.
https://archive.ph/5gfrv
Read again what I wrote. I said Shills and bots rely heavily on throw away names using lots of underscores, dashes and numbers. I did not say ALL do. Nor would my suggestions have any effect on existing accounts like yours, only new registrations.
PS- Did I strike a nerve? I wonder why...
Anything they don't own is against their belief structure.
And that's why they're here, more than likely.
Cause they fear losing what they own.
And it's likely cause they got it by uncredited means.
Because eventually the truth always wins.