What are you talking about? I am stating a fact. We are trying to reach the people. the people I am talking to just want to see the facts. I'm a screeching liberal because I am trying to help them see the truth?
I agree with OP and everyones getting downvoted who does evidently. This is a pony show right now of Mike saying there is fraud for 4 hours so far without providing the forensic evidence.
I want them to show it, not just randomly cropped pictures with no explaination.
I'm with you. Mike was the same in his films. In my opinion, the trick to running any sort of discussion is not to monopolise it - even if you know all the answers! I feel that Mike could get away with saying about 10% of what he does say and we would still have enough. If he just slowed down and sounded less hyper that would be an improvement.
That law professor has been cut off several times now by an over-enthusiastic Lindell - and he loses his way. he starts to say something which has two parts, he tells us the first part then distracts himself and ends up talking about something else.
As others have pointed out, Mike is paying for it all so he can say what he wants but if he wants to make the event more professional sounding then he should relent somewhat - IMHO.
this goes for 3 days...he put out all the $$ let the big dog eat
Sorry I disagree. This is not about Mike. I don't care how much money he put out. It is time to show the public the truth.
i support him but this is not the place for pride. I have some people at my house and they want to hear and see the proof.
i can only assume there are millions more that are thinking the same thing.
It's not about you either. You're acting like a screeching liberal "MUH FEELINGS ." It's his symposium not yours. Glowing.
What are you talking about? I am stating a fact. We are trying to reach the people. the people I am talking to just want to see the facts. I'm a screeching liberal because I am trying to help them see the truth?
What's the point of this post?
This should not be the Mike Lindell hour. it will turn people away.
Glowing again
Impatient. Lame.
I agree with OP and everyones getting downvoted who does evidently. This is a pony show right now of Mike saying there is fraud for 4 hours so far without providing the forensic evidence.
I want them to show it, not just randomly cropped pictures with no explaination.
Glowing
I'm with you. Mike was the same in his films. In my opinion, the trick to running any sort of discussion is not to monopolise it - even if you know all the answers! I feel that Mike could get away with saying about 10% of what he does say and we would still have enough. If he just slowed down and sounded less hyper that would be an improvement.
That law professor has been cut off several times now by an over-enthusiastic Lindell - and he loses his way. he starts to say something which has two parts, he tells us the first part then distracts himself and ends up talking about something else.
As others have pointed out, Mike is paying for it all so he can say what he wants but if he wants to make the event more professional sounding then he should relent somewhat - IMHO.
Glow faggotry.
DAMN! Took the words right outta my mouth.
Glowing