The thing about placebos is you're not supposed to know you get them. The whole vaccine is an experiment so they need to use placebos. This was probably planned and she was thrown under the bus to cover up the mass human trials currently happening. If they volunteer to be part of the vaccine experiment then by extension they volunteer for the potential for a placebo.
I agree this is one big experiment that none of us really consented to. That said, in a double blind trial, as part of the waivers, you are informed there will be placebos. There was no information to that effect in this experiment.
I don't think she's being thrown under the bus to cover up mass human trials. She will likely land in hot water though.
I thought we were the control group? Those that choose not to take a vaccine at all.
You don't need to sign a waiver if it done in mass le this because the world is the testing grounds. There is no consent with forced vaccinations anyway yoir point is invalid because taking the vax was never a choice to begin with.
What we are experiencing now, this world wide experiment is unprecedented. In the eyes of the law, you did sign a waiver by taking the vaccine. This is how the pharma companies can claim no liability. You implicitly entered into the contract if you took the vaccine.
There aren't forced vaccination yet. I know some people are basically being forced to choose between their health and their job, but they still have a choice, as awful as that choice is.
If and when vaccine mandates arrive, then yes, I agree there is no consent and no choice.
So do patients rights.
The thing about placebos is you're not supposed to know you get them. The whole vaccine is an experiment so they need to use placebos. This was probably planned and she was thrown under the bus to cover up the mass human trials currently happening. If they volunteer to be part of the vaccine experiment then by extension they volunteer for the potential for a placebo.
I agree this is one big experiment that none of us really consented to. That said, in a double blind trial, as part of the waivers, you are informed there will be placebos. There was no information to that effect in this experiment.
I don't think she's being thrown under the bus to cover up mass human trials. She will likely land in hot water though.
I thought we were the control group? Those that choose not to take a vaccine at all.
You don't need to sign a waiver if it done in mass le this because the world is the testing grounds. There is no consent with forced vaccinations anyway yoir point is invalid because taking the vax was never a choice to begin with.
What we are experiencing now, this world wide experiment is unprecedented. In the eyes of the law, you did sign a waiver by taking the vaccine. This is how the pharma companies can claim no liability. You implicitly entered into the contract if you took the vaccine.
There aren't forced vaccination yet. I know some people are basically being forced to choose between their health and their job, but they still have a choice, as awful as that choice is.
If and when vaccine mandates arrive, then yes, I agree there is no consent and no choice.