I'm watching live while the crowd is digging through the forensic images turned over by the Mesa County Clerk. I believe this shows the settings, configs, logs, databases, of the tabulation machines from before, during, and after the 2020 election.
They just discovered in real time that the machines had Microsoft SQL server installed which contained databases for elections going back to 2019, and then on May 25 this year, ALL of those databases were deleted by someone from Dominion.
This is another smoking gun.
Here's the problem, though. Those of us who have IT careers or backgrounds are able to understand what's going on without much hand-holding. But for the vast majority of the population, this is completely foreign. It is impossible for them to digest the information in any meaningful way.
The whole presentation should not have been featured in the symposium. They, at the very least, should have had it going on in a side-channel with other discussions going on being the feature. They could check in at intervals for updates.
This really just caused a lot of people's eyes to gloss over and tune out. This isn't me shitting on the effort. This is me saying that when you're presenting information of any kind, you need to understand your target audience. This thing was supposed to wake up all the normies, but they are not going to be moved by this presentation. They are going to tune out and because they didn't understand the information being shown, they will assume no information was presented.
I'm a normie with no IT or math background but found it fascinating. This is TRUE transparency - embrace it.
I'm in IT. What I saw were IT/forensic experts attacking a problem to resolve it.
I disagree with this statement. Watching them forensically disect this data first-hand was more interesting than having some IT jackleg talk to me like I was a 2nd grader. I think your statement implies that normies are oblivious to research, when in fact, research is basic in any field. It's just as fascinating to watch an IT expert "do his/her thang" as it is to watch a surgeon operate. I may not understand much going into it, but I'll have a good education by the end. I really think it depends more on the interest level of the person watching.
I've been doing "fascinating" IT presentations for decades. You are the exception, not the rule. One of the hardest lessons to learn for presenting is knowing your audience. This was hyped up so much as being a presentation of irrefutable evidence. But this information was delivered in such a way as to only add to people's incredulity.
To put it another way, for most people this was like watching two space aliens discussing astrophysics using a whiteboard for the hours. Sure, watching them might be fascinating to a few people, but no one is digesting the content of what they're saying except other space alien astrophysicists.
I waited to reply so I could verify, and yes the general public is invited to watch the live symposium. But, as you are saying, they do know their audience. As only politicians and IT persons were invited to witness the live action in person. It was presented to watch for the general public. I actually tried to get an invite since I was off work this week. But was unable to qualify as an in person guest. I'm just a chemical plant operator.
I think that's lindells main problem. Even when he's talking I tend to lose interest. It's great that he's done this,but he needs to have an awesome sales rep up there presenting this stuff.