That's what's in the manual, yes. Last updated 2015. I also thought, "Why?" but as you know we have proofs that the Q team seems to be doing this by the book.
The statement, "may resort to remedial action of the following types:", seems to be more a list of POSSIBLE remedies rather than a list of REQUIRED actions.
2015 would've been under Hilldawg and Barry. If the DS had oversight of the playbook wouldn't it make sense for them to include that last step? Steal the election, make it so obvious that these powers are invoked, only to end with a U.N. takeover. It's George Soros' wet dream. Hope I'm just reading it wrong.
That's what's in the manual, yes. Last updated 2015. I also thought, "Why?" but as you know we have proofs that the Q team seems to be doing this by the book.
The statement, "may resort to remedial action of the following types:", seems to be more a list of POSSIBLE remedies rather than a list of REQUIRED actions.
They are situational, yes.
2015 would've been under Hilldawg and Barry. If the DS had oversight of the playbook wouldn't it make sense for them to include that last step? Steal the election, make it so obvious that these powers are invoked, only to end with a U.N. takeover. It's George Soros' wet dream. Hope I'm just reading it wrong.
The law of war is not politicized in that way. It's international.