But the guy you replied to with "no, it's not" wasn't talking about that. He was simply pointing out that the OPs post title and the link match each other. So he's 100% correct while you saying "no, it's not" in response to "it's the link header" is 100% incorrect.
jesus fucking christ, you cunts
look at the body of the linked article
HE REMOVED THE WORD EQUIPMENT
But the guy you replied to with "no, it's not" wasn't talking about that. He was simply pointing out that the OPs post title and the link match each other. So he's 100% correct while you saying "no, it's not" in response to "it's the link header" is 100% incorrect.