Isn't it a felony to be dispensing medical advice without a medical license?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Probably not. But....
You might be able to make an argument that if they are requiring the jab due to "recommendations" from the CDC or the FDA, that they in fact they are acting in agency with these organizations for public trials, and as such any coercive measures they may be taking are a federal crime under 21 CFR 50.20.
In a sane world, this argument would hold water. In our clown world, I doubt any judge today would see it that way given the massive corruption that exists in our courts.
But you still might be able to put a bit of fear into them if you make sure they know you will press criminal charges against them personally under this statute if they do not immediately cease and desist. Remind them that they shouldn't count on a corrupt legal system to shield them forever, that you will record that they willfully and maliciously violated this statute, and that if it goes to trial you will push the DA to ask for the maximum prison sentence allowed.
Then expect that they will ignore you and fire you anyway. But at least they may have a tickle of fear when they do it.
Here's some sauce for others who, like me, are very interested in this tactic:
https://ecfr.federalregister.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-50/subpart-B/section-50.20
§ 50.20 General requirements for informed consent.
Except as provided in §§ 50.23 and 50.24, no investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative. An investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence. The information that is given to the subject or the representative shall be in language understandable to the subject or the representative. No informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution, or its agents from liability for negligence.
[46 FR 8951, Jan. 27, 1981, as amended at 64 FR 10942, Mar. 8, 1999]