The statistical differences between the sexes in sports have little to do with the corruptibility of differing people in politics - and there is no "more corrupt" sex.
Using the circumstances of an individual's birth to drive a social wedge is poor logic, sensei. It is what the forced arrayed against us do to drive us apart.
I'm a younger generation, now? Funny how your bias blinds you to the truth.
Women aren't inherently more corruptible, but the Marxist movement uses the social wedge of feminism to protect their corrupt pawns. 'You only say that because it's a woman.' Or 'not white' 'not English' and all of the other such bullshit.
Most of history has shown that the "-ism" used to corrupt is whatever finds purchase. More recently, for every Nancy Pelosi, I can find you at least one Chuck Schumer. To say that Pelosi was more easily corrupted is a reflection of your own indoctrination.
Thid is getting laughable. More ad hominems and projection. At least you've grown to include emotional rants since you can't win on logic. Care to bingo a fourth rule, my Alinsky wannabe?
Demanding I accept feminism's ideals so you can decry them is patently ridiculous. Please answer for why men are as much or more so corrupted in politics. You stated the answer amid your cry to support feminism, so you are halfway there.
Sinve you are going to go back, once again, to sports, what about the tyranny who was shown up at the Olympics by real women? I'm sure he doesn't count because of an internal rule that obviates your need to self reflect on your beliefs. If you are earnest, you pay attention to outliers that confirm your indoctrination and nothing else. If you aren't earnest, you're just following a (terrible) script.
The statistical differences between the sexes in sports have little to do with the corruptibility of differing people in politics - and there is no "more corrupt" sex.
Using the circumstances of an individual's birth to drive a social wedge is poor logic, sensei. It is what the forced arrayed against us do to drive us apart.
I'm a younger generation, now? Funny how your bias blinds you to the truth.
Women aren't inherently more corruptible, but the Marxist movement uses the social wedge of feminism to protect their corrupt pawns. 'You only say that because it's a woman.' Or 'not white' 'not English' and all of the other such bullshit.
Most of history has shown that the "-ism" used to corrupt is whatever finds purchase. More recently, for every Nancy Pelosi, I can find you at least one Chuck Schumer. To say that Pelosi was more easily corrupted is a reflection of your own indoctrination.
Thid is getting laughable. More ad hominems and projection. At least you've grown to include emotional rants since you can't win on logic. Care to bingo a fourth rule, my Alinsky wannabe?
Demanding I accept feminism's ideals so you can decry them is patently ridiculous. Please answer for why men are as much or more so corrupted in politics. You stated the answer amid your cry to support feminism, so you are halfway there.
Sinve you are going to go back, once again, to sports, what about the tyranny who was shown up at the Olympics by real women? I'm sure he doesn't count because of an internal rule that obviates your need to self reflect on your beliefs. If you are earnest, you pay attention to outliers that confirm your indoctrination and nothing else. If you aren't earnest, you're just following a (terrible) script.