A vaccine trial isn't a trial at all without a very large number of people receiving placebo. That is a requirement of a trial. They must have a quantity against which to measure the outcome who did not receive the actual vaccine. Standard scientific process. But who are those people? We don't know. Likely all those family members who aren't showing any signs of illness after the jab and even up to now.
But wait, there's more...
So if that's the case, and if this is a trial it must be the case, what about the deaths and injuries. Let's assume half are placebo. So take all that data on injuries that we know about in nations around the earth and the US. Just the recorded ones. NOW DOUBLE THEM because placebo reduces the number of those vaccinated by half, so the correlation of vaxed to injured is halved.
DEATH JUICE CONFIRMED. Is my assumption realistic?
https://rumble.com/vkgdq7-deadly-shots-former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-in-covid-vaccine.html
There is certainly real variability worldwide in terms of adverse reactions. Many people already have a dataset they can see in people in their own lives - asymptomatic positive PCR tests, Covid recovered, jabbed by different products with / without reactions etc. Some thoughts on reaction variability bearing in mind plausible deniability is a key factor: