If MSM says this is bad for us, that means it is bad for the DS. So it must be a good thing for Afganistan and a good thing for patriots.
The whole Pompeo thing seems to clinch it for me.
As others here said, so they get some gear, so what?
Same as when, who was it, iran?, got a whole bunch of f-14 Tomcats. So what? The maintenance costs were outrageous, and they had to cannibalize most of the fighters to keep a few running, (they were sold n o spare parts) so they have what, 2 still working? 1 f-38 could take down 20 of them single handedly. No threat there.
Look at it this way: projection.
If MSM says this is bad for us, that means it is bad for the DS. So it must be a good thing for Afganistan and a good thing for patriots.
The whole Pompeo thing seems to clinch it for me.
As others here said, so they get some gear, so what?
Same as when, who was it, iran?, got a whole bunch of f-14 Tomcats. So what? The maintenance costs were outrageous, and they had to cannibalize most of the fighters to keep a few running, (they were sold n o spare parts) so they have what, 2 still working? 1 f-38 could take down 20 of them single handedly. No threat there.
LOL, my bad, subtract 3.
But, with a good pilots, an f-38 Talon could still whoop up on Iranian f-14s.
Typo for F-35?