You're right, nobody calls a penis head a "mushroom tip"... Mushroom cloud... FFS
LOL. Either way, to say that someone has good ideas is not to say they are right about everything.
The entire point of his threads is to decode comms, which use symbolism as a means to allow people to read messages into media which normal people wouldn't see.
You know it is undisputed fact that "terrorists" around the world were funded and trained by the CIA, yes?
Do you know anything about terrorist strategy and tactics? Do you know why they act in isolated "cells", which are disconnected from any hierarchical command structure and each other? Why they don't generally know the identities of other terrorists they share alignment and goals with?
It's called compartmentalization. If one cell goes down, they can't identify anyone else and so the operation hasn't been crippled, even if compromised.
And so if you have cells of terrorists around the globe working toward certain goals, but you don't want traceable communications between those cells and the command structure, so they can't lead anyone back to the people in charge, how do you communicate with them?
This is pretty basic psychological and informational warfare stuff. If you don't believe this is how comms work, then I genuinely have no idea why you are on a Q page. We literally read comms into these cryptic posts put forth by some nameless, faceless identity on 8chan. It's kinda "what we do".
This guy turned the tactic on the other side. He is trying to figure out how to decipher the comms of the Deep State. Maybe he's right. Maybe he's wrong.
But he's thinking outside the box. He's practicing skepticism toward mainstream narrative structures. Which once again, is kinda what we DO, here.
So, if it isn't your cup of tea, if you don't find it valuable, don't read it. But I've been reading his shit for almost a year now, and I think he is on to something. I don't think he is right about everything, of course. But he is right about a lot. Future proves past, and he lays it out very clearly in his decodes, AT LEAST as well as anyone is able to do with the Q drops.
Oh I have no idea if he is right about them, but you have to admit it is kind of interesting to think about.
Nuclear armament has been the central theme of geopolitics since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Cold War, the spread of Communism. Cuba, North Korea, China, Israel. All the major players just happened to figure out the tech for this thing that had never been done before 1945, and we've been in a worldwide stalemate ever since under the guise of "mutually assured destruction".
What if it was all bullshit? What if Hiroshima and Nagasaki were massive firebombing campaigns re-branded as "nuclear" so that the powers that be had an unthinkably powerful weapon by which to keep all the peons in their place, when it is actually blackmail evidence of all these corrupt shitbags fucking kids, and so it is really THEM who is being controlled, and we're all just paying the price?
If they can make nuclear power portable, why can't we build much smaller nuclear reactors to provide more electrical energy to more people so we can stop our reliance on oil and gas and "green" sources? Why do we have "nuclear" submarines (covert vehicles), but we haven't made any other ships in the fleet, or trains, or tanks, or planes, or aerospace rockets nuclear?
I dunno, man. I don't think he's necessarily right about everything with it, but it is a pretty compelling case that there is SOMETHING fishy with nuclear as we currently think of it.
You're right, nobody calls a penis head a "mushroom tip"... Mushroom cloud... FFS
LOL. Either way, to say that someone has good ideas is not to say they are right about everything.
The entire point of his threads is to decode comms, which use symbolism as a means to allow people to read messages into media which normal people wouldn't see.
You know it is undisputed fact that "terrorists" around the world were funded and trained by the CIA, yes?
Do you know anything about terrorist strategy and tactics? Do you know why they act in isolated "cells", which are disconnected from any hierarchical command structure and each other? Why they don't generally know the identities of other terrorists they share alignment and goals with?
It's called compartmentalization. If one cell goes down, they can't identify anyone else and so the operation hasn't been crippled, even if compromised.
And so if you have cells of terrorists around the globe working toward certain goals, but you don't want traceable communications between those cells and the command structure, so they can't lead anyone back to the people in charge, how do you communicate with them?
This is pretty basic psychological and informational warfare stuff. If you don't believe this is how comms work, then I genuinely have no idea why you are on a Q page. We literally read comms into these cryptic posts put forth by some nameless, faceless identity on 8chan. It's kinda "what we do".
This guy turned the tactic on the other side. He is trying to figure out how to decipher the comms of the Deep State. Maybe he's right. Maybe he's wrong.
But he's thinking outside the box. He's practicing skepticism toward mainstream narrative structures. Which once again, is kinda what we DO, here.
So, if it isn't your cup of tea, if you don't find it valuable, don't read it. But I've been reading his shit for almost a year now, and I think he is on to something. I don't think he is right about everything, of course. But he is right about a lot. Future proves past, and he lays it out very clearly in his decodes, AT LEAST as well as anyone is able to do with the Q drops.
Maybe he is right about some stuff I was just talking about nukes though
Oh I have no idea if he is right about them, but you have to admit it is kind of interesting to think about.
Nuclear armament has been the central theme of geopolitics since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Cold War, the spread of Communism. Cuba, North Korea, China, Israel. All the major players just happened to figure out the tech for this thing that had never been done before 1945, and we've been in a worldwide stalemate ever since under the guise of "mutually assured destruction".
What if it was all bullshit? What if Hiroshima and Nagasaki were massive firebombing campaigns re-branded as "nuclear" so that the powers that be had an unthinkably powerful weapon by which to keep all the peons in their place, when it is actually blackmail evidence of all these corrupt shitbags fucking kids, and so it is really THEM who is being controlled, and we're all just paying the price?
If they can make nuclear power portable, why can't we build much smaller nuclear reactors to provide more electrical energy to more people so we can stop our reliance on oil and gas and "green" sources? Why do we have "nuclear" submarines (covert vehicles), but we haven't made any other ships in the fleet, or trains, or tanks, or planes, or aerospace rockets nuclear?
I dunno, man. I don't think he's necessarily right about everything with it, but it is a pretty compelling case that there is SOMETHING fishy with nuclear as we currently think of it.