I agree, I don't understand this part of the movie. Trump seems to be playing politics, which is not a good quality. i pretty much ignore him these days, i am no longer sure he is with us.
The fastest way for the globalists to get the left screaming for mandatory injections is for Trump to come out hard against them. Also consider the possibility that Trump knows what the narrative shift will be and is laying the groundwork for that. For example, let’s say the injection isn’t even the real battle, let’s say it’s mandatory injections and vax cards to leave your home. If Trump knows he is going to come out hard against that, wouldn’t his argument have much more credibility if he hadn’t already been saying the injection is poison? Instead he could say, “Look, I’ve supported the vaccine since it came out. I’m not anti-vaccine. But this? Mandatory injections, who knows how many boosters, swiping a card to leave your home? This is no good. This is not America. This is not freedom.” Obviously if they are able to write him off as anti-vaccine, that argument won’t matter. But if he is able to say he is very much pro vaccine, then they cannot just write him off. They will have to create a counter-argument. And once there is a counter-argument, millions will fall into those binary positions and we will have around 50% resistance off the top.
This is excellent, especially the notice of how he must be so careful to force them into making an honest counter argument against it instead of being able to make effective logical fallacies.
I agree, I don't understand this part of the movie. Trump seems to be playing politics, which is not a good quality. i pretty much ignore him these days, i am no longer sure he is with us.
The fastest way for the globalists to get the left screaming for mandatory injections is for Trump to come out hard against them. Also consider the possibility that Trump knows what the narrative shift will be and is laying the groundwork for that. For example, let’s say the injection isn’t even the real battle, let’s say it’s mandatory injections and vax cards to leave your home. If Trump knows he is going to come out hard against that, wouldn’t his argument have much more credibility if he hadn’t already been saying the injection is poison? Instead he could say, “Look, I’ve supported the vaccine since it came out. I’m not anti-vaccine. But this? Mandatory injections, who knows how many boosters, swiping a card to leave your home? This is no good. This is not America. This is not freedom.” Obviously if they are able to write him off as anti-vaccine, that argument won’t matter. But if he is able to say he is very much pro vaccine, then they cannot just write him off. They will have to create a counter-argument. And once there is a counter-argument, millions will fall into those binary positions and we will have around 50% resistance off the top.
This is excellent, especially the notice of how he must be so careful to force them into making an honest counter argument against it instead of being able to make effective logical fallacies.
Great point and I feel like we are quickly headed this direction.
best theory I have heard yet. Thanks for your comment.
I always had the impression that the end of the movie would be the moment we realize we're in it.