Okay fair enough. And I’m not trying to call you out or anything, just genuinely curious.
I see these sort of bad faith players like USPS advocating for this sort of thing and I can’t help but wonder if the goal is to build faith under the pretense of “unhackable” only to use that as cover to hack it. I mean, this go around, they only had to say it was the most secure election ever without even having a basis for saying so.
The key, is that the system has to be truly decentralized… because if is controlled only by one entity, then it will always be at risk to potential bad actors…
I agree and that’s sort of what I mean. I don’t consider it decentralized if a singular entity has access and potential control over the entire ledger or at least a majority. That’s hypothetical of course.
Okay fair enough. And I’m not trying to call you out or anything, just genuinely curious.
I see these sort of bad faith players like USPS advocating for this sort of thing and I can’t help but wonder if the goal is to build faith under the pretense of “unhackable” only to use that as cover to hack it. I mean, this go around, they only had to say it was the most secure election ever without even having a basis for saying so.
The key, is that the system has to be truly decentralized… because if is controlled only by one entity, then it will always be at risk to potential bad actors…
I agree and that’s sort of what I mean. I don’t consider it decentralized if a singular entity has access and potential control over the entire ledger or at least a majority. That’s hypothetical of course.